Gtx 1080 Ti Vs Gtx 1080

1080 Ti vs 1080


Price now
386$

Games supported
100%

Cost at present
408$

Games supported
100%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, marketplace segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating 36 59
Value for money 66.71 46.86
Architecture Pascal
(2016−2021)

Pascal
(2016−2021)

GPU code proper name GP102 Pascal GP104
Market segment Desktop Desktop
Release engagement 28 February 2017
(v years ago)
vi May 2016
(6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $699
$599
Current toll $386 (0.6x MSRP) $408 (0.7x MSRP)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General operation parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, but for precise assessment you have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that ability consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, specially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 2560
CUDA cores
no data
2560
Cadre clock speed 1481 MHz 1607 MHz
Boost clock speed 1600 MHz 1733 MHz
Number of transistors 11,800 1000000 7,200 1000000
Manufacturing procedure technology 16 nm xvi nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature 91 °C 94 °C
Texture fill rate 354.four 277.three
Floating-bespeak performance 11,340 gflops 8,873 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other estimator components. Useful when choosing a hereafter computer configuration or upgrading an existing i. For desktop video cards it’southward interface and passenger vehicle (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility).

Bus support
no data
PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.five” (26.vii cm) 10.5″ (26.7 cm)
Summit
no data
4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Width 2-slot ii-slot
Recommended organization power (PSU) 600 Watt 500 Watt
Supplementary ability connectors 1x 6-pivot + 1x 8-pin 8-pin
SLI options + +

Memory

Parameters of retentiveness installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and utilize a shared part of arrangement RAM.

Retention type GDDR5X GDDR5
Maximum RAM corporeality 11 GB viii GB
Memory passenger vehicle width 352 Fleck 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 11000 MHz 10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 484.4 GB/south 320 GB/s
Shared memory

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Every bit a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte du jour itself.

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI
Multi monitor back up + +
HDMI + +
G-SYNC support + +

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some detail technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost 3.0 three.0
VR Fix
no data
+
Ansel + +

API back up

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
OpenGL 4.5 iv.5
OpenCL 1.ii ane.2
Vulkan + 1.two.131
CUDA + +

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined criterion performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you detect some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak up in comments department, we usually gear up bug quickly.

  • Passmark
  • 3DMark xi Operation GPU
  • 3DMark Deject Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Burn Strike Graphics
  • GeekBench five OpenCL
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA
  • SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 maya-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 sw-03
  • SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 snx-02
  • SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 mediacal-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 catia-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 – Showcase
  • SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 creo-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 – Maya
  • SPECviewperf 12 – specvp12 showcase-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 – Catia
  • SPECviewperf 12 – Solidworks
  • SPECviewperf 12 – Siemens NX
  • SPECviewperf 12 – Creo
  • SPECviewperf 12 – Medical

This is probably the most ubiquitous criterion, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

3DMark xi is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. Information technology used iv tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken send, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded past Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX xi feature level ten benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280×720. Just like Water ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: xiv%

GTX 1080 Ti
142490

+xviii.8%


Burn Strike is a DirectX 11 criterion for gaming PCs. It features two split tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery beast seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 unlike test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping.

Benchmark coverage: ix%

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, function of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets operation. It utilizes DirectX 11 characteristic level 9 to display a boxing betwixt 2 space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte criterion combined from 11 dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Criterion coverage: 5%

Geekbench five is a widespread graphics carte du jour criterion combined from eleven different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU’south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: five%

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 grand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GTX 1080. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 1427 Mh/s 1045 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred) four.6 Gh/s three.09 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 35 Mh/s 27.63 Mh/s
Siacoin / SC (Sia) ii.96 Gh/s two.28 Gh/south
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.76 kh/southward 0.48 kh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 630 Sol/southward 470 Sol/s

Gaming operation

Let’south see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Hither are the average frames per second in a big set of popular games across different resolutions:

Total HD


131





129


1440p


89





eighty


4K


68





59


Popular games

  • Full Hd
    Low Preset
  • Total Hd
    Medium Preset
  • Total HD
    Loftier Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077


60−65





fifty−55


Assassin’s Creed Odyssey


100

+8.7%





92

−8.7%


Assassinator’southward Creed Valhalla


60−65

+19.ii%





50−55

−19.2%


Battlefield v

166

+0%




166

+0%


Call of Duty: Mod Warfare

60−65

−116%





134

+116%



Cyberpunk 2077


60−65

+19.ii%





fifty−55

−19.ii%


Far Weep 5


120

+1.7%





118

−1.7%


Far Cry New Dawn

104

−6.7%





111

+half dozen.7%



Forza Horizon 4


147

+5%





140

−v%


Hitman 3


60−65

+19.2%





50−55

−19.2%


Horizon Cipher Dawn


60−65

+19.2%





fifty−55

−19.ii%


Red Dead Redemption 2

lx−65

−54.eight%





96

+54.8%



Shadow of the Tomb Raider


120

+11.ane%





108

−eleven.ane%


Spotter Dogs: Legion


sixty−65

+xix.two%





50−55

−19.2%


Assassin’s Creed Odyssey


xc

+8.four%





83

−8.four%


Assassinator’s Creed Valhalla


60−65

+19.2%





50−55

−19.2%


Battlefield 5


154

+8.5%





142

−8.five%


Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

61

−85.two%





113

+85.2%



Cyberpunk 2077


lx−65

+19.2%





50−55

−19.ii%


Far Weep 5


117

+iii.v%





113

−3.5%


Far Cry New Dawn

102

−5.9%





108

+5.ix%



Forza Horizon four


145

+5.viii%





137

−5.8%


Hitman 3


threescore−65

+19.2%





50−55

−19.2%


Horizon Zero Dawn


60−65

+xix.2%





fifty−55

−nineteen.ii%


Metro Exodus


90

+21.half-dozen%





74

−21.6%


Red Dead Redemption ii


65

+22.6%





53

−22.half-dozen%


Shadow of the Tomb Raider


113

+fifteen.iii%





98

−15.3%


The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

lx−65

−nineteen.iv%





74

+19.four%



Spotter Dogs: Legion


threescore−65

+xix.2%





fifty−55

−19.2%


Assassin’s Creed Odyssey


71

+12.7%





63

−12.vii%


Assassin’s Creed Valhalla


lx−65

+19.2%





fifty−55

−nineteen.two%


Battleground 5


149

+21.ane%





123

−21.i%


Cyberpunk 2077


60−65

+19.2%





50−55

−19.2%


Far Weep 5


109

+4.8%





104

−four.8%


Far Cry New Dawn

94

−iv.3%





98

+iv.3%



Forza Horizon 4


120

+7.ane%





112

−7.1%


The Witcher iii: Wild Chase


98

+21%





81

−21%


Scout Dogs: Legion


60−65

+19.2%





50−55

−nineteen.2%


Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare


91

+23%





74

−23%


Hitman 3


60−65

+19.ii%





50−55

−19.two%


Horizon Aught Dawn


threescore−65

+nineteen.2%





l−55

−xix.ii%


Metro Exodus


56

+24.4%





45

−24.4%


Red Dead Redemption 2


41

+17.ane%





35

−17.one%


Shadow of the Tomb Raider


73

+fourteen.1%





64

−14.1%


Assassin’s Creed Odyssey


62

+26.5%





49

−26.5%


Assassinator’s Creed Valhalla


60−65

+19.two%





50−55

−19.2%


Battlefield 5


118

+20.4%





98

−20.4%


Cyberpunk 2077


60−65

+19.ii%





50−55

−19.two%


Far Weep 5


97

+26%





77

−26%


Far Cry New Dawn


88

+seven.3%





82

−7.3%


Forza Horizon iv


102

+9.7%





93

−9.7%


Spotter Dogs: Legion


lx−65

+19.2%





50−55

−19.2%


Call of Duty: Modern Warfare


52

+23.8%





42

−23.8%


Hitman 3


lx−65

+19.ii%





50−55

−19.ii%


Horizon Zero Dawn


60−65

+19.2%





50−55

−xix.2%


Metro Exodus


35

+25%





28

−25%


Reddish Dead Redemption 2


27

+28.half-dozen%





21

−28.6%


Shadow of the Tomb Raider


41

+28.one%





32

−28.1%


The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt


72

+28.6%





56

−28.six%


Assassin’s Creed Odyssey


40

+21.ii%





33

−21.2%


Assassinator’s Creed Valhalla


60−65

+xix.ii%





fifty−55

−nineteen.2%


Battlefield 5


70

+32.1%





53

−32.1%


Cyberpunk 2077


60−65

+19.2%





50−55

−19.2%


Far Cry 5


55

+31%





42

−31%


Far Cry New Dawn


57

+21.3%





47

−21.three%


Forza Horizon four


75

+15.4%





65

−xv.4%


Lookout Dogs: Legion


60−65

+xix.two%





fifty−55

−19.2%


Advantages and disadvantages


Functioning rating 62.35 51.94
Novelty 28 Feb 2017 vi May 2016
Price $699 $599
Retentivity bus width 352 256
Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 2560
Memory bandwidth 484.iv 320
Thermal design power (TDP) 250 Watt 180 Watt

Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti


since it shows better performance.


Should you nevertheless have questions concerning pick between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Practice you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking “Similar” button almost your favorite graphics carte.


Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti by AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 1080 Ti’s AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6700 XT, which is faster by iii% and college by 7 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
100

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 by AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 1080’s AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600 XT, which is faster past 4% and higher by 4 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with operation more or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here yous tin encounter the user rating of the graphics cards, besides as rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a calibration of 1 to five:





Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 on a calibration of 1 to five:





Questions and comments

Here yous tin enquire a question about this comparing, hold or disagree with our judgements, or written report an mistake or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS


Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1080-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-1080