But why am I building this site?
The biggest reason is probably simply because I like exotic and cutting border science. I have a nose for it, so to speak. And I wanted some place to brain-dump all my research in a logical coordinated manner, so information technology made sense, and where other people could also use information technology.
In all honesty, I also needed someplace on the internet here where I could postal service ads for other books I have written (starving writer story here…). So I’m killing lots of birds with one stone hither.
It is likewise my conventionalities that past providing and explaining this basic framework, we can use information technology to ascertain the mechanism whereby some inventors take been able to make things fly without truly existence able to explain or empathise why (like David Hamel’s flying 55-gallon drums).
Similarly, it should also let us start to classify in a logical method, some of the many ufos that nosotros see out there, to identify the technologies they use, and to empathize them.
Ultimately, the nomenclature arrangement should too guide some of our (and mine too) research into new breakthroughs.
I want to walk on the moon some day – information technology’due south on my saucepan list. And I figure, based on the mode things are going here at home, with our economic system going to hades, the growing welfare-itization of gild, and the destruction and regulation of all personal initiative, responsibleness, and dignity, the only person that information technology going to get me in that location, is me. So this is my brain dump as I begin to explore every engineering science I tin discover, before I first edifice prototypes…
I hope you relish reading through this page every bit much as I enjoyed writing it, and maybe even playing with some of the technology yourself. I know I volition…
Note: Rather than provide y’all with specific links to certificate every single technology that I mention, I volition leave it to y’all to google them yourself. Links come and go like the seasons, and there are some very proficient ones out there explaining (in detail some of them), the different technologies more thoroughly. The purpose of this site is not to explain the inner workings of every unmarried technology out in that location that I mention, but rather to briefly build a classification system whereby nosotros can first making sense of all these different emerging or rediscovered technologies.
Anti-gravity and Propulsion
(Technology used to overcome gravity and/or move effectually)
Category I. Reaction Mass
I’m non going to spend a lot of time on this ane considering information technology is already and then familiar to u.s.a.. It’south all action and reaction physics. Throw something backwards, whether mass or energy, and you movement forward. Unproblematic. Whether it’s a straight chemic rocket, a jet engine, or even an ion or nuclear pulse deep space engines, they all throw something backwards in order to motility forward.
The problem is that as soon equally you run out of mass or energy to throw backwards, you stop accelerating forwards, and either friction or the local gravity field (or magnetic, electric, etc) will drag on you and eventually slow you lot dorsum down to a finish. And at some point, the mass/weight of the reaction mass or fuel becomes so prohibitive that the engine doesn’t even move frontward anymore (information technology’south the whole F=ma thing again).
In the case of getting off the footing and going UP, it’due south a brute strength method of overcoming gravity (and by and large fairly inefficient compared to other methods). You expend an equal or greater forcefulness in the contrary direction than that of gravity, such that you go Upward. It’due south ANY propulsion method that OVERCOMES the effects of gravity rather than shielding its effects, disconnecting from its effects, reversing its effects, or otherwise using another technology to leverage against gravity.
Category II. Force-Field Propulsion
Strength field propulsion is a more fun culling to reaction-mass technologies. And at that place are several unlike ways to accomplish it.
The most basic form of forcefulness-field propulsion comes to us past fashion of the Biefield-Dark-brown outcome. Originally discovered by Thomas Townsend Brownish, who took his findings to the more established Biefield (who publicized them), the issue is named later on both men who together made it famous.
But here’southward the gist of it. When yous charge upwards a rigid flat plate capacitor to sufficiently high voltage (apparently as little as 5,000 volts in some situations), the whole assembly will develop thrust towards the positive plate (and move in that direction if un-impeded). Brownish found that the college the voltage, the higher the thrust. And the higher the dielectric value of the insulator betwixt the plates, the higher the thrust. And apparently, the thrust developed does non especially “use up” the high voltage used to initiate the outcome.
Then he started experimenting with changing the ratios of the surface expanse of the plates in regards to each other, and thus developed some fairly disproportionate field densities that magnified the result. Then when he reportedly started rotating them also, he achieved enough thrust for levitation and lift-off, at which point the United states armed services reportedly stepped in and all of a sudden classified all of his work after that indicate.
I accept as well come up across handwritten notes on the web detailing an “electric rocket” design, supposedly invented past a young kid quite a few years ago. I know of a number of groups of people actively trying to recreate this device from the drawings, with scattered reports of success. Unfortunately, most of them (people trying to indistinguishable information technology) are working blindly (imho), by trial and error, without really understanding what they are doing. I think that if they recognized the design for what it is, a cascaded Biefield-Brown device, I personally recall that they would immediately start seeing more success in duplication of the device.
Notation: Some prototypes of the electric rocket device also apparently produce a “wind” pressure (NOT ionic in nature, as it easily (reportedly) passes through most matter) of some sort that operates at a distance to push Against other matter/mass. Though I exercise non believe this to be truthful reverse gravity per se’ (as it would logically change the magnitude of its effect based on the size and density of the mass being pushed confronting, if it were a reverse gravitational effect), I also exercise not accept a caption of what it might exist, nor have I had a risk to research it yet.
A tiny.. rabbit trail here…
Star trek impulse engines in their long nacelle assemblies, could be duplicated incredibly piece of cake by using massive Biefield-Dark-brown Pour devices. The Enterprise 1701 is an incredibly advisable design in fact for this technology, especially if you couple it with Tesla’s MHD FST-eject bulldoze (keep reading; FST=Fabric of Space-Time).
In that location is besides another forcefulness-field consequence called the MagnetoHydroDynamic (MHD) effect (apparently pioneered by Tesla), that can exist produced past air core, flat plate capacitors running at high-frequency and high-voltage, such that the Lorentz forces generated by current flowing crossways across the capacitor gap apparently produce massive, directional thrust (I mention this one again farther down beneath).
In that location are other ways too to develop thrust straight from energy without reaction mass (like pumping certain luminescent materials with pulsed light, or working with expanded quartz, etc), but the Biefield-Brown and MagnetoHydroDynamic (MHD) effects are still the nearly well known and best studied so far.
Category Iii. Inertia Conversion
This applied science really depends on inertia to create forward motion, in contrast to some of the other technologies discussed so far. The Cowlishaw GIT device converts angular momentum of spinning masses directly into linear motion. The Dean drive, the Melt drive, the Morgan drive, Laithwaite’s gyroscopes, and others, all do this by various ways as well, through true mechanical ingenuity.
I accept besides noticed though, that some of these designs operate more smoothly than others – several of them take a real trend to “pogo-stick” forth equally they “rachet” themselves through the FST – Cloth of Space Time.
In summary though, you could build a totally enclosed black box, totally sealed (no ports, no holes, no active surfaces, no cipher), with a bombardment, motor, and spinning gears and weights and whatnot inside. Drop information technology in the middle of space, plow it on, and the box takes off, and keeps going for as long equally the battery lasts. Information technology’south very cool. Information technology’south non a very good method of brute force lifting, only for small maneuvering in a gravity complimentary environment, this one is ideal.
Category IV. Density and Pressure Manipulation
We’re all pretty familiar with some of the more classic, downwards-to-Globe applications of this category using air and chemistry. A rapidly moving plane wing/air-foil or rotating propeller creates a pressure differential between above the fly (or air-foil) and below it (the Bernoulli consequence), that pulls the fastened airplane or craft forrard (or UP). Hot air balloons and blimps that contain a trapped book of depression(er) density air wants to ascent above the surrounding (more) dense air. A hot air balloon or sailboat travels frontward due to current of air air pressure put upon them. Combustion engines turn by burning some fuel in a confined space such that the force per unit area created moves mechanical/physical objects. Etc and so forth.
Where things get interesting in regards to space flight, is when you first applying these same asymmetric pressure level and density differential forces to things similar gravity, magnetism, electricity, light, and fifty-fifty the fabric of infinite-time itself. We can build devices that create a magnetic or electric differential betwixt above and below a arts and crafts, such that the arts and crafts rises through a planet’s surrounding magnetic or electric field.
Just like you lot dilate the Bernoulli effect past spinning/rotating an air-foil shaped propeller in the air (a fluid), I believe you tin can theoretically also amplify or magnify the (I’thou looking for a name for it) upshot created by quickly spinning/rotating an asymmetric magnetic foil corollary to a propeller. This device volition pull you lot through a magnetic field (also a fuid), just similar a propeller pulls y’all through air. It is this writer’s humble hypothesis that the rotating magnetic cones in 55-gallon drums from David Hamel (he is also known for his theoretical “granite butterfly” ufo blueprint), brand up a magnetic pressure differential cascade device.
There is as well no reason why you can’t practise the same thing with electric fields (as well fluids). If you plant a loftier voltage point source or line, separated from a much larger target high voltage footing, the two poles existence separated by a suitable loftier strength dielectric insulator, you create a massively asymmetric electric differential field between them. If y’all rotate them, theoretically you amplify their effect. With a device such as this operated within the earth’s electric field, you should get some very cool results.
And because other people have been ripping off this page and posting it across the net equally their own enquiry, I am calculation a blurb here. If you are not reading this on the Antigravity101 dot com site, y’all are reading something someone has stolen from me, and you need to go to that site itself to read the existent deal. Sad. Cheers. -tim
But dorsum to business…
Solar sails rely on the idea that the force/pressure exerted past sunlight reflecting off the sails, will provide plenty forcefulness (on a sufficiently large canvass) to advance a infinite craft frontward. A gravity shield canvas might work the same way. I talk more below nearly the force per unit area exerted by gravity waves on inertialess objects also being enough to provide propulsion. By appropriately angling a gravity shield, yous could even theoretically control the management of propulsion based on a single gravity source, much like a sailboat can tack any direction, even INTO the air current, based on the angle of the sail to the arts and crafts and wind.
There is another blazon of pressure/density differential propulsion that I believe is actually capable of FTL (faster than light) speeds. I have run beyond it in several different places.
The first place I came beyond this thought, was in the writings of Tesla, the father of our modern electric grid, iii phase motors, tesla coils, florescent lights, and more than. He constitute that apartment plate, air cadre capacitors powered by his tesla coils did funny things to the very fabric of spacetime. AC powered tesla coil capacitors running at loftier ability seemed to “densify” (is that a give-and-take?) the very textile of space-time in the capacitor (to the signal of information technology acting similar actual matter that could be pushed against – at that place’s possible transport shield technology here, imho). Pulsed DC tesla whorl capacitors on the other paw, expand or decompress the textile of space time.
The stop upshot is that if you put an Air conditioning tesla ringlet powering a sideways air-space capacitor of sufficient size in the dorsum end of your space ship, and a DC tesla scroll powering a similar capacitor in the front end or bow, then your send will literally “squirt” through the fabric of spacetime. If you chimera/disconnect the rest of the ship from the local gravity frame of reference (run across below), this transport would theoretically be capable of massively huge speeds well beyond the speed of light.
The second place I came beyond this idea, of compressing and expanding the FST (Fabric of Infinite Time-some people also call it the Nix-Point Field or ZPF) around a star-ship in order to provide FTL propulsion, came from NASA itself, whereby they recently proposed a theoretical way to achieve this (without the disconnection process though). They are calling it a “warp” drive, later the star trek series that fabricated the theoretical warp engine a common everyday word.
How do I know the FST is actually compressible, or expandable? If you have e’er visited the “gravity vortex” outside of Medford, Oregon (U.s.a.), y’all’ll know what I am talking most. There are natural FST compression and expansion fields active in that location, whereby you can actually feel the furnishings (and document them photographically) equally you walk through them. Information technology’s really a very cool place to visit. And supposedly, it’south not the only geographical location on Earth where these fields tin can be seen and felt.
Category V. Bio-Kinetic
History is replete with anecdotes and instances of people self-levitating, or lifting objects with thought alone (telekinesis), usually while as well spiritually meditating, slumber walking, or using “magic” of some sort. There are fifty-fifty actual sleep studies that have documented sleep walkers that counterbalance much less while sleep walking, than while awake. And when getting into UFology, there are occasional abductee stories where the “conflicting” abductors claim to movement their craft through mind power alone.
Indeed, there are even stories of various concoctions of diverse ORMUS and ORMEs (Orbitally Rearranged Mono-atomic Elements – elements that are often toxic in their most natural land, just not when in Ormus form) and m-state materials, that when ingested, amp up a person’due south thought power and let them to manifest things physically (similar the ability to self-levitate). Practise ORMUS elements exist? Without a dubiousness. I’ve even watched them exist created (anyone ever see transparent silverish? It’s beautiful). Have I documented their physical effects on my own psyche? Noooo…. not nonetheless anyway. Information technology’s kinda dangerous to have your thought process permanently amped up – consider if every fourth dimension y’all cussed something out, or cursed information technology, it immediately came true.
Of course, bio-levitation with unseen assist from the spirit world falls into this category too, but is not just fraught with danger, but style beyond unsafe, so it is strongly discouraged by this author.
Alternately, I have as well heard rumors of bodily thought moving ridge amplifiers made from detached electronic components that allow a person to manifest specific events like bio or craft levitation, or telekinesis, without besides manifesting unwanted side-issue stuff while living normal life the residuum of the time.
Category VI. Gravity Field Shielding
The research of Podkletov first brought this concept to me, and it was bolstered by other technologies that I later came across. Only Podkletnov first.
Podkletnov discovered that masses to a higher place spinning superconductors seemed to lose weight, and that the effect had very well defined edges to it. As in, Anything/EVERYHING in an invisible cavalcade extending straight upwards from one of his flat spinning superconductors, seemed to lose weight. The conclusion was that the spinning disc was somehow “shielding” everything above it from the effects of gravity below. And though it was but a partial loss, the elementary fact that it was possible at all, means that logically, in that location should also exist ways to make the upshot complete, ways only waiting to be discovered.
Technically though, the “antigravity” effect in this engineering might really simply be a secondary effect. Basically, the column of air in a higher place the shield loses weight and thus rises. This creates a suction/vacuum below the ascension air where air rushes in to replace what is already ascent. It’south an air fountain. If the shield generating device is somehow continued to a “parachute” or something that can ride the “gravity thermal” or “air-fountain” that is created above the shield, then you get a arts and crafts that lifts and goes up.
And so I came across some other engineering that I believe to be a primarily gravity shielding issue also, with possibly chimera and/or repulsion effects thrown in to boot (see below). It’s an effect chosen the “Crenel Structure Effect”, patently discovered and outset publicly documented by a Russian scientist by the name of Viktor S. Grebennikov dorsum in 1983 or so.
In brusk, he discovered (beginning in insect wings), that sure structures and resonant/repeating arrangements of specifically shaped cavities, will cause a gravity shielding event, helping some insects to fly. In particular, he found it in insects that classical physics can’t explain why they can get off the ground at all (certain bees fall into this category).
He was reportedly able to duplicate an array of these cavity structures is such a way as to build a small platform (shield) upon which he could stand and thus fly around (it had something similar cycle brake control cables to control the effects). And he did mention existence surrounded in something of a bubble when thus flying. It was also his firm belief that other powers-that-be had also discovered this issue and had built working prototypes of flying vehicles using this technology.
Oh goody! Another Rabbit Trail!
What is the speed of gravity (or gravity waves)?
I hear the term “Gravity WAVES” more and more than, another inkling that some scientists are starting to recollect or recognize that gravity is more than just a bones field like electricity or magnetism alone- no one talks about magnetic waves, or electricity waves…
In short, the problem is that if gravity is a property of space-time itself, so Podkletnov’s spinning superconductor gravity shield shouldn’t work. The effects of Gravity travel THRU/Beyond spacetime in basically direct lines (though information technology can be lensed slightly apparently), without being an intrinsic part of information technology, merely like EM waves (light, radio, gamma, etc).
The effects of Gravity propagate so fast as to be nearly instantaneous for all practical Earth-local purposes. This is one reason why Einstein concluded that gravity was a property and curvature of space-time itself, and coined the idea of “gravity wells”, but because if y’all wait at the dynamics of even our own solar organisation, if you presume that gravity (and/or its effects) travel only at the speed of light, then the planet earth is falling towards a point where the sun WAS viii minutes ago, and the whole arrangement breaks downward. The interaction HAS to be instantaneous, or about and then, in gild for planetary orbits to remain stable.
And then here’s the kicker. If we modulate Podkletnov’due south gravity shield with data, the cavalcade of space above it becomes similar a information communication gravity laser (graser? You heard it here first!) where information transfer could/would occur at speeds and distances far beyond the capabilities of what current radio and EM field modulation allows for.
I just ran across an commodity awhile dorsum (x-14-14) wherein Podkletnov (aye, same guy) has now measured what he believes to be the speed/velocity of gravity (or its effects), and he puts it in the vicinity of 64c (64 times faster than the speed of light), though in reading the article, I exercise not know if he is measuring the actual speed/velocity of
Gravity, or the speed of the effects of his force-field “repulsor” beam (which may or may not be the same as gravity itself, imho). http://world wide web.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3169171/posts
Category Vii. Field Disconnection or “Bubbling”
One of the lesser understood principles of gravity and inertia is the concept that if you lot “disconnect” an object from the local gravity field, its apparent inertia also goes abroad (classical scientists will debate this with you all day long though. I only claiming them to explain to me why the constants for mathematically finding the inertia of an object, and the dispatch constant due to Earth’s gravity, are for all applied intents and purposes, are the aforementioned number).
This leads usa to all sorts of interesting possibilities. For example. If you make an object’s inertia become away, you too make its credible mass go away. And co-ordinate to the well known classical formula F=ma (the strength required to movement an object is equal to the mass of the object times the acceleration you desire to reach), if yous driblet your mass to nothing, your acceleration goes through the roof, using the aforementioned applied strength as before. IE, a mere finger film could send an apparent ten-ton object sailing across the room if it is asunder from the local gravity field (the disconnection process wiping out its inertia and apparent mass).
And yeah, there are means to exercise this, and it tin exist verified by observational evidence (like ufos making right bending turns at high speed -no inertia), quondam inventions buried in the U.s.a. patent function that certificate the ability (I’ve seen them), and anecdotal evidence gained by people experimenting with, and chasing, this phenomenon.
Now fifty-fifty though when dealing with gravity this “disconnection issue” by itself is non a truthful “antigravity” effect in the strictest sense of the word, I included it here considering information technology IS a direct interaction with gravity, even though it nonetheless requires some other method (though negligible) of propulsion to actually escape a and so-called “gravity well”.
Just when we look into magnetic bubbling equally well, now we’re into a whole new subject area.
And herein lies 1 of the major differences betwixt gravity “fields” and directly, simple magnetic or electrical fields. Magnetic and electric fields act more like a fluid, filling in gaps and spaces and flowing around and through items. Throw a non-magnetically permeable detail into a magnetic field, and the field merely goes effectually it similar a river flowing around a floating log. But throw a gravity shield into a gravity field, and suddenly you get gravity shadows, just similar you would expect from normal electromagnetic fields (especially high frequency ones like visible light). Gravity, though information technology can be aptitude slightly, typically operates in straight lines. It doesn’t menstruation around things.
Which brings up an interesting phenomenon. If you disconnect an object from both the local gravity AND magnetic fields, suddenly you get a buoyancy event from your magnetic bubble floating in the Earth’s magnetic field (which flows like a fluid-thicker closer to footing level, but weaker (less dense) the farther out you become). This buoyancy effect is more than strong enough to create the forcefulness necessary to smash an object that has had its inertia nullified, high into the sky just similar a bubble of air shooting up to the surface of water.
In that location are several different methods of achieving this “chimera outcome” that I have run across or am aware of.
And considering diverse scum suckers take been reposting this page across the cyberspace without giving me credit, I (tim, the original author) am adding a disclaimer here. If you are not currently on the Antigravity101 dot com website, you are reading plagiarized material, and y’all might or might not be reading my real thoughts on the subject and my proposed BCAPS classification system. Please come to the real site I just mentioned. Sad. tim benedict
Back on runway at present…
I’ve heard of guys using discrete electronic components and pseudo EM theory to create a “blocking” shield chimera that bubbling off an area. Y’all can create nuclear resonance within an object such that information technology vibrates out of phase with the local gravity field (well-nigh as I tin tell anyway). Y’all tin even practise this with audio waves and compute it mathematically (former ufo stories of ufos sounding similar a 1000000 pipage organs all at once, or tibetan monks flying huge boulders using peculiarly tuned musical instruments and scores, etc so forth). Y’all can as well apparently use microwaves and/or loftier strength ELF (extremely depression frequency) fields to create this same nuclear resonance (Francis Aquino is a proper name that comes upward here). You can use pulsed rotating magnetic fields (look up Dan Davidson). Yous can use loftier speed rotating, odd-spin land metals (like mercury) to create the effect (Vimanas, TR-3B, others). You can plainly use specially shaped high frequency, high voltage fields. And more than.
And at present for….. some other Rabbit Trail (or iii…)
If you could create a asunder bubble such that even the local EM field (similar light and radio waves) flowed Effectually you (which they DON’T usually do – normally they are either absorbed or reflected – and cast shadows), suddenly you take radar and visual invisibility (agile camouflage, in more than military terms). Plainly, the rumored Philadelphia Experiment was an attempt to do simply this, but apparently the matter-phase-shifting side-effects were disastrous, with plainly lethal furnishings on some of the crew. Proceed with circumspection…
Rabbit Hole #2. If you lot create a bubble with a very strong but cleanly defined edge, the gravity, magnetic, electric, and EM field force per unit area gradient across that boundary could theoretically be fabricated strong enough to literally rip Whatsoever mass trying to cantankerous that boundary, into a million pieces (think star trek ship shields). With a stiff plenty sheer across the boundary, the boundary itself would simply become impenetrable versus destructive (theoretically, or course).
Rabbit Trail #3! Everyone talks about the speed of light being the absolute maximum velocity accessible in any propulsion method (and they likewise talk most the accompanying fourth dimension-dilation and relativistic effects). And for many technologies, this is true.
Merely there is one faulty assumption that everyone besides makes when they country this as fact.
This “law” ONLY holds true for technologies that remain tied to the universe’s gravity field, and thus retain their inertia. Inertia and mass are the limiting factors in the equation here.
If on the other mitt though, you disconnect from the universal gravity frame, and take your apparent inertia to zero, suddenly the speed of low-cal limit also evaporates (along with most or all of the relativistic time dilation furnishings likewise). Your speed/velocity is all of a sudden express Only past how completely (or not) that you accept asunder or bubbled off from the universe at large in social club to travel.
Category VIII. Field Reversal
For a long time now, scientists accept debated the idea that since magnetism and electricity both have two poles whereby a field (fluid-like) flows betwixt them, whether or non gravity might also be like, and take 2 poles, whereby you could create a opposite gravitational field that repels normal gravity, kinda like 2 magnetic north poles repel each other, or two magnetic south poles, or 2 positive electrical potentials, or ii negative electric potentials, etc and then along.
Let’s await at the first half of this presoposition first. In whatsoever two pole scenario, when there are just two poles whereby a field flows between them, and then like poles repel, and different poles attract. Magnetism works this style, as does electricity. Hence, if you build a craft that points a n magentic pole down while in the Northern Hemisphere of Earth, or a south magnetic pole downwards in the Southern Hemisphere, the craft should bladder on the magnetic repulsion field created. Same with Electrostatics. Lightning happens when sparks jump betwixt clouds in the temper, and ground (the other pole). If you lot build a craft that presents a negative charge down, it should be repelled by the negative charge of the Earth itself, and float (and glow). Then how do we do the aforementioned with gravity, as gravity doesn’t seem to have two poles whereby flow happens between them?
Unfortunately, in everyone’s attempt to create the grand theory of everything linking gravity, electricity, and magnetism, it is my opinion that their working premise is flawed.
Let me explain.
Classical scientists usually lump gravity in with both magnetism and electricity equally a fundamental force in a triangle of the three. The trouble is, I don’t think gravity should be in this triangle. In its effects, in my humble opinion, gravity acts more than like electro-magnetics (an practical combination of electricity and magnetism), than it does either magnetism or electricity alone. Gravity effects are more like lite (look upwards “gravity lens”), being able to be bent, but also able to throw shadows (similar from gravity shields). Electricity and Magnetism both flow into and around items like a fluid. Gravity acts more similar an applied specific combination of the 2 (like to electromagnetism-which also does Not necessarily FLOW betwixt two poles), rather than a force similar to them.
Now having said all this, are there means that we tin can repel EM (electromagnetic) fields? Sort of.
Depending on the frequency, radio waves will bounce off of grounded solid objects (satellite tv dishes use this idea). Radar waves bounce off of solid objects like aircraft. Etcetera and so forth. And all EM fields exert measurable (though generally pocket-size) force per unit area on whatever object that they bounce off of. Even calorie-free does this (recall about the solar sails some scientists are proposing for some of our “deep space” probes).
I believe a reflected gravity field would do the same thing (exert pressure level). And if the object reflecting the gravity field/moving ridge was also “disconnected” (which naturally it would be, backside a reflective shield) and was thus inertia-less, this reflection pressure could exist substantial plenty to crusade meaning movement and “repulsion” appearing furnishings.
It thus as well follows then, that if gravity is also only a special combination field of electricity, magnetism, and perchance another atomic level field(s), nosotros tin can also cause gravity “waves” to bounce off of an object (thus causing a repulsion-like issue).
Now we come to a theoretical applied science championed by someone named Bob Lazar, who claims to have worked on reverse engineering a crashed ufo. He claims that at its cadre, the engine of this particular craft contained a mass of element number 115 which theoretically, contains an atomic nucleus large enough to observe by normal methods, the EM component of actual gravity waves emanating from the element’s nucleus . By and then simply amplifying, phase shifting the betoken 180 degrees, and so rebroadcasting that signal, information technology would repel normal gravity and provide elevator.
I believe that while theoretically possible to do what he proposes from a technical standpoint, I do non believe this technology creates true reverse gravity repulsion, just rather just a phase cancellation of the local gravity field and thus a disconnection/chimera issue (the same concept behind noise cancelling headphones) where the gravity reflection pressure is the force moving the craft, versus a true reverse gravity repulsion effect.
And yet another Rabbit Trail!
At that place are a growing number of scientists that believe that gravity is actually a subset of a new field of wave theory chosen “Scalar Waves”, basically like electromagnetic waves that (by some accounts, and by various means) have their magnetic component either stripped out or phase cancelled. Scalar waves can reportedly do all sorts of cool, bizarre, and weaponizable things (too as “repel” or “disconnect” from the local gravity field). Interesting stuff, if you get into it and enquiry information technology.
There is 1 other theory that bears mention here, because it actually answers some problematic questions that other gravity theories can’t. It’s similar this. I was reading where a number of years agone, a spacecraft of some sort measured the effects of gravity on the other side of the moon from the World, expecting to see the effects of BOTH the moons AND the Earth’s gravity SUMMED on the spacecraft’s mass. Instead, they read a SUBTRACTION of the moon’southward gravity from that of the Earth. Explain that ane! So someone proposed that gravity is just empty FST “pushing” affair together, versus mass “attracting” mass together. There are actually some very intelligent people pushing this paradigm shifting idea. And If this is true, then the moon would act every bit a partial shield on the spacecraft from the Earth’s gravity, perfectly explaining the actual experimental/empirical results they obtained. If this a more authentic gravity model than the “attraction” ane that classical physics teaches, then suddenly, all sorts of new possibilities for intelligent and effective gravity control present themselves…
One last Rabbit Trail here, and and so I’grand done…
If you look through the patent office, there are actual existing patents already on file for devices that create “gravity-like” attraction fields. Once we sympathize how to create them, it logically follows that we should then also exist able to figure out how to shield, disconnect, and/or “repel” them also.
And 1 concluding fourth dimension, because several different bottom feeders have reposted this folio other places on the internet without giving me proper credit and even challenge it as their ain piece of work, I (timothy benedict, the original author, google me) take to add a disclaimer here. Sorry about that. If you are non currently looking at my Antigravity101 dot com URL, yous are reading a ripoff site. And worse, yous might non even exist reading my original words, or seeing the actual BCAPS nomenclature system presentation. I suppose I should be flattered past this attention and their attempts at faux, but I’m not amused in the to the lowest degree. Sorry. the author timothy benedict
Category Ix. Nix-Point Field (ZPF) Energy Extraction / Gravity Conversion
There are a number of devices out in that location, amidst them Floyd Sugariness’s aquiver magnets and/or other devices that rely on resonant phenomenon, that announced to produce more free energy than they consume, becoming so-called “over-unity” devices. And while according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, this isn’t possible in a closed organization, the universe is not a airtight system. Information technology is an open organization, and the extra energy produced past these machines appears to be either coming from the theoretical zero-bespeak field of space time, or from converting gravity straight into other forms of energy (usually electricity). I say this because there are consequent reports associated with these machines that along with actress energy production, in that location is oftentimes a respective reduction of credible weight, up to and including total weightlessness.
Category Ten. Wormhole, Gateway (like a “stargate”), Tesseract (space folding), Doorway, Teleporter…
At present we get into a whole new category of broad theoretical (and real) possibilities (that might eventually need to really be separate into two categories). I’m non going to say much about this category here though, simply because I do not have plenty hard facts to back myself up however, only some theories, hypothesises, and anecdotal show. Note: I’one thousand including the category in the classification just because somewhen, it volition need to be hither. I’ve met and talked with people who have seen, used, or experienced “doorways” and/or teleporters first hand, so I believe some of this engineering science to already exist existent, but I just don’t understand most of it well enough yet to explain them yet.
Category Xi. Hyperspace
Meet the notation on Category Ten above. I have theories and ideas, but not fifty-fifty validation or anecdotal prove yet. Then I’m not going to talk virtually them yet, other than to repeat what I mentioned above. Information technology includes any technology that involves jumping to an alternate, parallel or hyper, or sub dimension to travel in before dropping back to this one someplace else…
Category XII. Orgone
When you go into orgone research (likewise known by a agglomeration of other names also, depending on who discovered this or that attribute of the orgone field), you find all sorts of crazy stuff. Some of information technology is conspicuously disinformation, but a lot of it is amazingly consistent among the different researchers out in that location. Although I personally have very limited cognition and feel with working direct with orgone, and thus can’t speak authoritatively on the field of study, I will point out some observations I have made concerning it.
Orgone fields are supposed to be able to brand stuff levitate, and I’ve read lots of anecdotal evidence to that effect. They also obviously get shorted out by things similar stiff EM and radar fields. Lots of researchers will too attest to this. AND this is the but thing I can come up up with to explicate the sudden windfall of UFO crashes that the Usa regime experienced in 1947 right subsequently they turned on the national radar grid (from what I empathize) for the kickoff time.
It also explains the consequent reports in early UFO-logy nearly various craft existence tied to the pilot’south intent and volition (orgone fields collaborate with and couple very hands with living things). Ii names that come up every bit pioneers in the field of orgone inquiry, just to name a few to get you started on your way, include Victor Schauburger and Wilhelm Reich.
In fact, some people would actually make this whole category of propulsion and antigravty techniques a subsection under the Bio-kinetc classification considering orgone is supposedly and so strongly tied to “life-strength” and the operators in that location-of. I have called to make it its own class because it can also be channelled and manipulated mechanically, without user intervention, with whole entire machines and apparatuses congenital upon information technology to use and harness it.
And so I believe orgone fields are real. They are harnessable, in reproducible ways. And they tin patently make stuff fly and move. So I included it. And I gave information technology its ain classification because it appears that some of the mechanisms whereby it creates movement, practise not autumn neatly into any one of the previous sections.
Stay tuned while I do research on whether or not to include Tesla’s “Radiant Free energy” nether its ain classification besides, or make it a subsection of a something else!!!
(Every antigrav or propulsion method I could think of or can recollect having come up across – in no particular order, as of July 2014)