Iphone 11 Pro Max Camera Front

The iPhone 11 Pro Max is Apple’southward latest meridian-of-the-line smartphone, featuring a large 6.5-inch “Super Retina” XDR OLED display, Apple’s near powerful A13 Bionic 7Mn+ chip for processing, 4GB of RAM, IP68-rated sealing for dust/water protection, and Qi wireless charging.

The front-facing photographic camera benefits from a hardware upgrade over previous models, with a higher-resolution 12MP sensor for sharper shots and wider-bending 23mm-equivalent lens. The lens is still fixed-focus, with the same f/two.2 aperture, equally the lens on the XS Max, merely the wider field of view will certainly help fit more into the frame. Other features include smart HDR, and bokeh shots with Apple tree’s SL (Structured Light) 3D camera doing the depth sensing.

Front-camera video has been upgraded, too, with the iPhone 11 Pro Max now capable of 4K (2160p) capture at either 24/30/60fps frame rates, likewise HD (1080p) capture at 30/60/120fps. The video module as well benefits from gyroscope-based electronic paradigm stabilization (gyro-EIS) for theoretically smoother video capture using the front end camera.

With iPhones facing tough contest in our rigorous tests of smartphone image quality, information technology will be interesting to encounter if the hardware upgrade on the iPhone eleven Pro Max helps propel Apple’due south latest device up in the rankings. Read on for in-depth analysis of its strengths and weaknesses in our comprehensive review.

Primal forepart camera specifications:

  • 12MP-resolution sensor
  • Fixed-focus, 23mm-equivalent f/2.two-aperture lens
  • SL 3D photographic camera
  • Smart HDR
  • Portrait fashion with bokeh and depth command
  • 4K 2160p/60fps video


Almost DXOMARK Selfie tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone front camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 1500 test images and more 2 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’due south default settings. This commodity is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Selfie test protocol, click here.

Exam summary

92

selfie

Achieving a DXOMARK Selfie Score of 91, the front end camera on the iPhone 11 Pro Max offers a nice improvement in epitome quality over the XS Max, and ranks just inside the peak x in our database. The addition of a wider lens on the new device is a big plus, helping you fit more into the frame and get better compositions in a range of situations. At that place are other strengths, too, including a higher score for focus, with both faces and backgrounds boasting good item at a range of distances, and effective bokeh shots when you want to mistiness the background.  Selfies pack plenty of dial outdoors, too, with accurate exposure on faces, and fairly wide dynamic range ensuring well-controlled highlights and skin tones even in very brilliant conditions.

Exposure on the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is good, with wide dynamic range that produces dainty, colorful skies in outdoor selfies.

Colour rendering has been improved on the iPhone 11 Pro Max, also. White rest is typically a piddling yellow, but the warmer skin tones can be attractive, and good saturation ensures that colors are pleasant and oftentimes vivid in outdoor shots. Details are as well well preserved, with well-defined facial features in both unmarried and group selfies at close and medium range; and skin tone rendering usually looks natural.

Assuming and striking color rendering, particularly in outdoor shots.

The stock-still-focus lens with a broad depth of field delivers sharp and in-focus faces at close distances.

Bokeh shots are also a central strength for the iPhone 11 Pro Max’s selfie shooter, and the stiff background mistiness looks really hitting. Apple tree’s SL 3D camera generally does a good chore with depth interpretation and bailiwick isolation. A notable area for farther evolution, however, is dissonance, which is ofttimes very prevalent in both indoor and low-light images. Racket has improved slightly since the XS Max, but front-facing cameras from key competitors proceed to offering smoother results in low-light conditions.

Indoor exposures are skillful, but particular is low and racket loftier.

Depth estimation in portrait mode is proficient merely not perfect.

Video shows some of the same strengths and weaknesses as stills. The lens’southward wider field of view, expert focus at virtually distances, and extended depth of field brand the iPhone xi Pro Max’southward front end photographic camera a much more suitable solution for vlogging compared to previous iterations. Video exposure is also very skilful, with the inclusion of HDR processing offering a adequately broad dynamic range in brilliant outdoor lighting conditions, which is still a petty rare for video on front cameras. Color is pleasant when white balance is accurate, and although slight white balance instabilities are axiomatic, the device generally avoids any offensive colour casts. 4K capture also ensures good detail in videos; fine detail is well preserved, especially in outdoor weather, and the texture-versus-noise compromise is adept. Detail and racket in indoor videos is the main opportunity for improvement, however, with a significant loss of detail and stiff noise visible in lower light weather.

Apple iPhone xi Pro Max forepart camera, outdoor video walking

Photograph scores explained

The Apple tree iPhone xi Pro Max front end camera achieves an overall DXOMARK Selfie Photo score of 93, which is calculated from its scores in tests that examine dissimilar aspects of its performance under unlike lighting conditions. In this section, nosotros’ll take a closer look at these image quality sub-scores, analyzing key aspects of the 11 Pro Max’s performance versus some of the key competition.

Exposure and Dissimilarity

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

72

90

Huawei P50 Pro

All-time: Huawei P50 Pro (ninety)

Broadly similar to the XS Max, exposure on the iPhone 11 Pro Max isn’t quite as practiced every bit with top devices overall, only information technology has some prissy strengths. Tested in the lab, target exposures are fairly good in lighting conditions between 20 and 1000 lux, just shots are noticeably underexposed in very low light.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, target exposure analysis past lighting condition

Apple’due south “Smart HDR” processing also ensures very good control of the highlights in bright light atmospheric condition. In this example, the iPhone’south target exposure is accurate, highlights are well maintained, and practiced contrast produces a punchy overall result.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, adept target exposure

Asus ZenFone 6, proficient target exposure

Samsung Galaxy S10+, good target exposure

We did experience some HDR failures in a few of our most challenging exam scenes, merely overall, the iPhone 11 Pro Max handled vivid light conditions well. Adept highlight particular on faces with potent side lighting is over again visible in this shot, together with accurate exposure of the clouds and a nice blue sky.

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max, wide dynamic range

Asus ZenFone 6, wide dynamic range

Samsung Galaxy S10+, slightly express dynamic range

Where the iPhone xi Pro Max dropped the most points was in low lite-testing, withal, where it’due south behind many of the top performers. At 10 lux, faces are noticeably underexposed.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, underexposure in low calorie-free (x lux)

Asus ZenFone half dozen, slight underexposure in depression light (10 lux)

Samsung Galaxy S10+, decent exposure in depression calorie-free (ten lux)

Color

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

82

100

Google Pixel six Pro

Best: Google Pixel 6 Pro (100)

There’s a prissy comeback in colour over the XS Max, which was 1 of the weaker aspects of the previous device due to white rest failures and inaccurate skin tones. On the eleven Pro Max, yet, color rendering is pleasant in nigh weather condition, and colors are vivid and well-saturated, especially outdoors, while maintaining adequately accurate skin tones.

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, pleasant and vivid color outdoors

Asus ZenFone vi, less saturated color outdoors

Samsung Galaxy S10+, noticeable desaturation in this instance

White residue definitely veers towards yellowish, merely information technology’s non unpleasant if you similar a warm feel to your selfies. That said, outdoor white balance is more neutral on the iPhone 11 Pro Max compared to the XS Max, and its white balance is repeatable, then you lot get the aforementioned color in consecutive shots. Under artificial lighting, the yellow color cast is noticeably stronger, though, and the impact on peel tones is more obvious. The iPhone eleven Pro Max improves color shading compared to previous devices, likewise, and although it remains slightly visible in indoor and low-light shots, information technology’s better controlled.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, warm white balance outdoors

Asus ZenFone 6, blueish/pink white balance outdoors

Samsung Galaxy S10+, more neutral white balance outdoors

Focus

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

82

97

Huawei P50 Pro

Best: Huawei P50 Pro (97)

Focus is at present a fundamental strength for the iPhone 11 Pro Max, with its fixed-focus lens ensuring reliable performance and good sharpness at close (30cm) and medium (55cm) range. The chief improvement is a more extended depth of field, which has significantly improved particular at longer 90cm and 120cm distances on the 11 Pro Max compared to previous models.

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max, acutance by subject altitude

So at close range, single-person selfies display good particular on the face and in the background, making the iPhone a good option for tourist or environmental selfies. In this example, the autofocus-enabled Asus ZenFone 6 is the sharpest on the confront, but with its much shallower depth of field, details in the background are lost.

Apple tree iPhone xi Pro Max, in-focus faces at close range

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop

Asus ZenFone 6, in-focus faces at shut range

Samsung S10+, in-focus faces at close range

With subjects at 120cm from the camera, faces are noticeably softer on the iPhone compared to the equivalent ZenFone half dozen and Samsung S10+ shots, however, which is of import to consider if you’re a fan of long-range selfie-stick shots.

Apple tree iPhone eleven Pro Max, out-of-focus face at long range

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, ingather

Asus ZenFone six, in-focus face at long distances

Samsung Galaxy S10+, in-focus face at long range

Samsung Milky way S10+, ingather

On the flip side, if yous’re more of a shut-range group selfie shooter, the extended depth of field on the iPhone ensures good detail on all faces.

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, wide depth of field

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop

Asus ZenFone 6, very shallow depth of field

Samsung Milky way S10+, wide depth of field

Samsung Milky way S10+, ingather

Texture

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max

66

85

Samsung Milky way Z Fold3 5G

All-time: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (85)

Racket

Apple tree iPhone xi Pro Max

63

xc

Huawei P40 Pro

Best: Huawei P40 Pro (90)

Apple has managed a dainty comeback in texture on the xi Pro Max, which was one of the weaker areas for its predecessor. Now close to a top performer, the eleven Pro Max’due south particular has improved a little in very vivid lite, but significantly under indoor and low light, with good acutance of around 60% measured on static scenes in our lab analysis.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, acutance by lighting condition

In indoor natural scenes information technology’s non quite as impressive as the Asus ZenFone half dozen with its larger sensor, only the iPhone is at present more on par with other traditional front camera setups similar that on the S10+. Nosotros did occasionally find some unusual face rendering with unnatural-looking details or varying levels of noise on faces, simply it doesn’t always happen.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, acceptable particular and dissonance indoors

Apple iPhone xi Pro Max, crop

Asus ZenFone half-dozen, practiced detail and depression noise levels indoors

Samsung S10+, low detail simply acceptable noise indoors

Noise is a principal weakness, however, and although there’s been some slight improvement since the XS Max, Apple tree applies very petty noise reduction compared to the height performers. Although noise is sometimes visible in outdoor shots, it’s not besides problematic, but in lower calorie-free conditions, noise starts to go more than obvious, with colored or chromatic noise oftentimes axiomatic.

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, visual and chromatic dissonance by lighting condition

Yous can see in these low-light indoor examples that more noise is evident on the confront of the subject in the iPhone case than in the others, with a buildup of coarse dissonance sometimes visible in shadow areas.

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, adequate dissonance in depression light

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, ingather

Asus ZenFone six, practiced racket in low light

Samsung Galaxy S10+, adequate dissonance in low light

Samsung Galaxy S10+, crop

Artifacts

Apple iPhone eleven Pro Max

74

92

Apple iPhone 12 mini

Best: Apple iPhone 12 mini (92)

We deduct points for noticeable artifacts and obvious image quality flaws. The principal penalties we applied to the iPhone 11 Pro Max were for loss of acutance (sharpness) in the field and anamorphosis, or baloney of faces nearly the edges of the frame. Some lens flare, color fringing, and ringing are also occasionally visible when shooting towards a brilliant calorie-free source, but less problematic generally.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, distortion of faces well-nigh the edge of the frame is evident in group selfies.

Flash

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max

74

93

Huawei P40 Pro

All-time: Huawei P40 Pro (93)

Apple continues to make pocket-size improvements in flash performance, but results from the “Retina” (screen) flash on the eleven Pro Max doesn’t claiming the tiptop performers in this category. Scores are like across flash-merely and mixed-lighting shots, with the latest iPhone capturing accurate exposures on faces when using flash in both conditions. Color rendering is acceptable, likewise, and although the warmish white rest is still evident, information technology’due south not offensive and skin tones remain fairly pleasant. The primary drawback is low particular and high noise, however, which is evident in all wink shots and specially towards the corners in flash-only shots. Vignetting is noticeable in flash-only shots, and our testers observed some exposure instabilities over consecutive shots when using wink in mixed lighting conditions.

Apple tree iPhone eleven Pro Max, flash at 0 lux

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, ingather

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, flash at five lux

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, ingather

Bokeh

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

70

75

Huawei P40 Pro

Best: Huawei P40 Pro (75)

Bokeh is one of the strongest aspects of the iPhone eleven Pro Max’southward performance, with Apple making slight improvements to the already well-implemented organization on the XS Max. Its SL (Structured Lite) 3D camera engineering uses rays of infrared light for depth-sensing and for mapping the position of the portrait and the groundwork. It works pretty well, masking complex areas similar a spanned hand or wispy pilus fairly successfully, without any obvious or jarring artifacts around the bailiwick. The corporeality of blur applied to the groundwork is strong, which looks hit if you like that kind of effect, but may await a little overdone to some. Dissonance uniformity is practiced, so racket levels are consequent across sharp and artificially-blurred areas, and the effect is repeatable, so the aforementioned results are achieved over consecutive shots.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, good depth interpretation

Apple iPhone xi Pro Max, crop

Asus ZenFone half-dozen, excellent depth estimation

Samsung Galaxy S10+, adept depth estimation

Samsung Galaxy S10+, ingather

Video scores explained

The iPhone 11 Pro Max achieves a DXOMARK Selfie Video score of 90 points, placing Apple’s flagship smartphone in the top 5 devices we’ve tested for front camera video. We calculate the overall video score using the post-obit video sub-scores: Exposure (73), Color (76), Focus (87), Texture (73), Noise (63), Artifacts (87), and Stabilization (75).

The iPhone 11 Pro Max continues to be a top performer for video exposure, thanks to the implementation of HDR video on the front camera, which ensures fairly wide dynamic range in about outdoor conditions. Information technology’southward non perfect, and our testers did observe some exposure irregularities while shooting natural test scenes, simply generally you can expect good exposure on faces and well-controlled highlight detail. Tested in the lab nether controlled conditions, video target exposures are also first-class under indoor and outdoor conditions, and adequate in low light downwards to xx lux. Measurements in extreme depression low-cal of 5 and 1 lux are low, but these are extremely night atmospheric condition for shooting video, then affected the video score merely a little.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, video target exposures by lighting condition

Video texture has improved over the XS Max, and although Apple front cameras aren’t top performers in this category, the addition of 4K capture on the iPhone eleven Pro Max ensures splendid particular on outdoor videos. There’s a noticeable loss of particular in indoor and low-low-cal videos, which has impacted the texture score a little, simply withal, it remains practiced for these weather.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, outdoor particular and noise video capture

Apple tree iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, fine detail preserved

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor detail and dissonance video capture

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, low particular and visible noise

The texture-versus-noise merchandise-off is as well very good in outdoor videos, but the device suffers badly from heavy dissonance in indoor and depression-light videos, which is a key area of development for futurity iterations.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, visual dissonance and chromaticity by lighting condition

Front photographic camera video focus is a key strength for the iPhone 11 Pro Max, which ranks 2d in this category behind the Google Pixel two. This is primarily thanks to the same extended depth of field we saw with stills, so whether you’re filming yourself at shut range, or a group selfie from a footling further back, faces are in good focus and details in the background are well defined.

Color in the iPhone 11 Pro Max front photographic camera videos has improved significantly over the XS Max, too, and color rendering is pleasant when white balance is accurate, only slight white rest instabilities are occasionally axiomatic. Effective stabilization is another strength, thanks to well-controlled motion in static handheld videos and with moderate walking movement; and although a slight judder is visible with panning actions, it’s far from the worst we’ve seen.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max front camera, outdoor video walking

Apple tree iPhone xi Pro Max front camera, indoor video panning

Conclusion

The switch to a wider-angle lens and the addition of 4K video capture make the iPhone xi Pro Max front camera a worthwhile upgrade over the XS Max. Image quality continues to improve and Apple’due south latest flagship front camera is a solid performer, capable of excellent results for both stills and video, with nice exposures, wide dynamic range, and generally pleasant color rendering.

The new lens delivers first-class focus at most distances, too, with extended depth of field ensuring adept focus for grouping portraits and backgrounds; and Apple’s 3D SL photographic camera technology provides a nice bokeh result.

There are some opportunities for future improvement, however, every bit loftier levels of noise continue to be an issue both outdoors, only particularly in lower lite weather. Ranking beneath the top five in our database, it’south non a top performer, but the iPhone eleven Pro Max remains a solid selection for those upgrading from an before iPhone, or switching over to Apple for the first time.

Photograph

Pros

  • Pleasant and bright colour, specially outdoors
  • Accurate exposure with wide dynamic range
  • Good detail on faces at short distances
  • Long depth of field

Cons

  • Warm white balance casts
  • Visible noise in all conditions
  • Out-of-focus faces at long distances
  • Baloney of faces towards the edges of the frame

Video

Pros

  • In-focus faces and good depth of field
  • Accurate exposure with wide dynamic range
  • Constructive stabilization
  • Pleasant color when white balance is accurate
  • Nice texture-versus-noise trade-off

Cons

  • Heavy noise and depression detail indoors and in low lite
  • Color quantization indoors and in low light
  • Slight white residue instabilities

Source: https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-11-pro-max-front-camera-review/