Iphone 13 Pro Max Custom Case

Samsung Milky way Z Fold 4 vs iPhone xiii Pro Max: Which phone wins?



(Image credit: Future)

A Samsung Milky way Z Fold iv vs iPhone 13 Pro Max face up-off is more than just a bout between the nigh expensive smartphones from the 2 leading phone makers. It’s every bit much near the benefits and limits of traditional phones versus the new foldable phones, and iOS vs. Android.

The freshly released Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 seems poised to become the best of the best foldable phones we’ve tested, but as impressive as the huge inner brandish and awesome multitasking features are, it’southward yet a $one,799 device.

The iPhone thirteen Pro Max, on the other manus, is the current pinnacle of traditional smartphone design. It’southward the top of our best phones guide for a reason. Its performance and photography are unmatched, although it’s express in ways that the Z Fold four and other foldables aren’t.

If you’ve got a generous smartphone upkeep, nosotros’ve got all the important parts of the Milky way Z Fold four vs iPhone 13 Pro Max broken down and compared below. By the end, we can assist yous decide whether to get Pro with the iPhone, or become flexible with the Z Fold.

 Samsung Milky way Z Fold 4 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: specs

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 iPhone 13 Pro Max
Starting price $1,799 $ane,099
Display(due south) vi.ii-inch AMOLED outer (2316 x 904)/ 7.6-inch AMOLED inner (2176 x 1812) 6.7-inch OLED (2778 ten 1284)
Refresh rate 120Hz adaptive (both displays) 102Hz adaptive
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Apple A16 Bionic
RAM 12GB 6GB
Storage 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Rear cameras 50MP main, 12MP ultrawide, 10MP 3x optical telephoto 12MP principal, 12MP ultrawide, 12MP 3x optical telephoto
Forepart camera(s) 10M selfie (outer), 4MP under-brandish selfie (inner) 12MP selfie
Battery iv,400 mAh 4,352 mAh
Charging 25W wired, seven.5W wireless 20W wired/15W wireless
Size half-dozen.ane x 2.6 x 0.55-0.62 inches (closed) /half dozen.1 ten v.1 x 0.21 inches (open) 6.iii x 3.1 x 0.iii inches
Weight 9.2 ounces viii.five ounces
Dust/water resistance IPX8 IP68

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: toll and availability

Apple’s been selling the iPhone thirteen serial, including the iPhone 13 Pro Max, since last September. It currently retails at $one,099 for the bones 128GB model, although go along in mind that nosotros’re expecting the iPhone xiv and iPhone 14 Pro in a thing of weeks. Take a look at our iPhone fourteen Pro vs. iPhone 13 Pro face-off to see what the differences are rumored to exist.

The Galaxy Z Fold 4 is going on sale on Baronial 26, with a base toll of $ane,799 with 256GB of storage. That’due south considerably more than the iPhone, only that’s what y’all get when yous go for a foldable that doubles as a tablet. If you desire a more than comparably priced foldable, there’s also the Galaxy Z Flip 4, although its capabilities aren’t quite as good a match for the iPhone.

Winner:
iPhone 13 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs iPhone thirteen Pro Max: pattern

As a foldable, the blueprint of the Galaxy Z Fold 4 is more than complicated than the boilerplate smartphone. With the telephone closed, you have a vi.2-inch regular phone display through which you can use all the Z Fold four’due south features, but you only get the full experience by opening the fold up to encounter its full seven.6-inch display, comparable in size to a small tablet.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and iPhone 13 Pro Max side-by-side

(Prototype credit: Tom’s Guide)

The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a normal slab of smartphone, aside from Apple’s unique design flourishes like the Face ID notch and the flat sides. Every bit a result it’due south lighter than the Z Fold 4 by 0.7 ounces, and is a picayune taller and wider, plus a lot skinnier than the folded-up Samsung. Information technology can’t unfold into a larger version of itself, only information technology certainly takes upwardly less space in a skinny pocket.

Apple also wins for durability. Although the front and back of the Milky way Z Fold iv uses Gorilla Glass Victus Plus, the inner display is insufficiently fragile. Apple has equipped the iPhone xiii Pro Max with Ceramic Shield glass, which is also pretty tough, but without a  folding screen it’ll stay fully functional even after a nasty drop. The iPhone also has a full IP68 grit/h2o resistance rating, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold iv is only IPx8, meaning it has no official protection against intrusion by dust, sand, gravel and other small dissentious items.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and iPhone 13 Pro Max side-by-side

(Image credit: Tom’due south Guide)

For colors, the Galaxy Z Fold 4 is available in Phantom Black, Graygreen or Beige (or Burgundy if you lot purchase it through the Samsung store). The iPhone 13 Pro Max offers more choices, with the range consisting of Graphite, Gold, Silver, Sierra Blue and the more recently introduced Tall Green.

Winner:
iPhone 13 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: displays

The Galaxy Z Fold four’s cover brandish isn’t impressive when y’all compare information technology to the iPhone thirteen Pro Max’s screen. Information technology measures half dozen.2 inches rather than half-dozen.vii inches, and offers only an HD+ resolution rather than Apple’due south roughly FHD+ resolution. Both feature adaptive 120Hz displays though, which makes scrolling through your apps smooth while also saving battery when required.

Even the splendid iPhone screen doesn’t really compare to the Z Fold iv’south inner display though. It’southward a whopping 7.6 inches across, uses a squarer attribute ratio for enhanced productivity and as well has a 120Hz refresh charge per unit. It causes complications for the pattern every bit we noted higher up, and there’s still a bit of a crease down the center of the display, but you won’t find a larger display on a device that’due south still a telephone.

In the table below, y’all’ll run into the results of our display testing on both phones, and we can see that the Galaxy Z Fold iv comes off the best here.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold four (outer/inner) iPhone 13 Pro Max
Delta-Due east (lower is meliorate) 0.33/0.34 0.21
sRGB colour gamut (per centum) 207/224 109
DCI-P3 color gamut 146/158 77
Max brightness (adaptive mode on) 870/905 nits 837 nits

Both of Samsung’s displays are brighter and more colorful than the iPhone 13 Pro Max’southward screen by some margin. Even so, the iPhone still provides a amend Delta-E colour accuracy score, for those who value seeing video and photos precisely equally they were taken.

Winner:
Samsung Milky way Z Fold 4

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold four vs iPhone thirteen Pro Max: cameras

Both the iPhone and the Samsung use iii rear cameras with the same functions simply different resolutions. The iPhone 13 Pro Max uses iii 12MP cameras for primary, ultrawide and 3x optical telephoto duties, while the Galaxy Z Fold 4 uses a 50MP main photographic camera, 12MP ultrawide camera and 10MP 3x optical telephoto camera.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and iPhone 13 Pro Max side-by-side

(Image credit: Tom’s Guide)

For frontward-pointing snappers, the iPhone again uses a 12MP sensor in its selfie camera. The Galaxy Z Fold four is greedy though, offer 2 selfie cameras. The first, a 10MP camera, is in a punch-hole on the cover screen, while the second is a 4MP under-display camera on the inner display.

Because the iPhone 13 Pro Max tops our all-time photographic camera phones guide, it’ll be difficult for the Galaxy Z Fold iv to lucifer up to it. Even so. in the comparisons below, the Z Fold 4 does a surprisingly practiced job in keeping up with the iPhone.

Take for instance this shot of a statue. The color of the iPhone paradigm is pleasantly warmer than the Z Fold 4’s, but you get more item from the darker parts of the image taken by the foldable.

As well take a look at this portrait shot of TG’s global editor-in-chief Mark Spoonauer. Once more he’s given a warmer glow past the iPhone, but the Z Fold gives just as much particular and just equally bonny a bokeh outcome.

Looking now at an ultrawide shot, the deviation is smaller. But if anything, the Z Fold 4’s got the amend image here, providing extra effulgence that helps bring out the background buildings. The grass is a bit oversaturated, merely nevertheless looks pleasant.

This zoom shot focussing on the Chrysler Building shows there’s little deviation between the phones when information technology comes to 3x telephoto camera performance. We will be performing more camera tests at max zoom level and in depression low-cal.

In this low calorie-free shot I give the border to the Galaxy Z Fold 4. The unabridged scene is more brightly lit. However, the colour in the loving cup is richer in the iPhone thirteen Pro Max.

At 15x zoom the Galaxy Z Fold four does a amend task rendering the buildings in this shot and the tiles on the roof to the left expect more divers. The iPhone 13 Pro Max’s photo has a more digital zoom expect and information technology’s a chip fuzzy.

And here you can see how much further the Galaxy Z Fold four tin can push with its 30x Space Zoom. It’s twice the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Granted, the “GWR” letters on the building aren’t that crisp, just it’s nice to accept the pick to get in more.

Even if you prefer the iPhone’s image processing, the Z Fold 4’due south cameras are definitely a considerable upgrade on the Galaxy Z Fold three’s, and are in line with those used on the Galaxy S22, which also features on the best camera phones guide. We’re not impressed by the under-display photographic camera though, which y’all’ll probably want to reserve using only for video calls rather than taking nicely posed selfies.

Winner:
iPhone 13 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: functioning

The beating center of the Galaxy Z Fold 4 is the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, paired with 12GB RAM. As a result, we get some of the best scores of whatever Android phone released this year.

Note that that’s Android phones, not all phones. The iPhone xiii Pro Max’south A15 Bionic chipset with its 6GB RAM yet conquers all the contest, including the Z Fold 4 on all the major tests we run, every bit you can run into beneath.

iPhone 13 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy Z Fold iv
Geekbench 5 (single cadre/multi-core 1,720/iv,549 1,328/3,831
Wild Life Unlimited (score/FPS) 11,418/68 8,819/52.83
Wild Life Farthermost Unlimited (score/FPS) 2,584/15 2,677/xvi.03
Adobe Premiere Rush (mins:secs) 0:25 0:45

The iPhone thirteen Pro Max wins on Geekbench, which measures overall operation, as well as on 3DMark Wild Life (graphics), though the Samsung pulls ahead on the Extreme portion of the test. And the iPhone 13 Pro Max transcoded a 4K video faster than the Z Fold 4 in Adobe Premiere Rush, taking 20 seconds less.

Whichever phone you look at, you’ve got plenty of storage room. Both phones offer the same 256GB, 512GB and 1TB storage options, but the iPhone 13 Pro Max besides has a base of operations 128GB version available too, adept if you desire to go on the price down.

Winner:
iPhone thirteen Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Bombardment and charging

Inside the Milky way Z Fold four are a pair of batteries with a combined capacity of 4,400 mAh. That’s more than the four,352 mAh cell in the iPhone 13 Pro Max, merely a) Apple has always managed more with less when information technology comes to batteries, and b) the Z Fold 4 has to power two displays, one significantly larger than average.

The iPhone xiii Pro has some of the best phone battery life of any phone we’ve tested, lasting 12 hours and xvi minutes in our custom battery exam at its normal adaptive 120Hz refresh rate. The Milky way Z Fold 4 manages an impressive xi hours and 31 minutes on the same test, just only by turning the screen to a fixed 60Hz way. We’ll report dorsum with more results soon.

The Galaxy Z Fold 4 has a slight advantage with charging speed. Information technology can power up at up to 25W, instead of but 20W like the iPhone, which means after half an 60 minutes plugged in, the Z Fold 4 reaches 42% accuse from 0%, rather than 40% as the iPhone does.

The iPhone should accept the advantage for wireless charging though, as its MagSafe standard tin can provide up to 15W. The Z Fold 4 has to make do with the seven.5W basic Qi charging standard.

Winner:
iPhone 13 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold iv vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Software

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4

(Paradigm credit: Futurity)

The iPhone 13 Pro Max runs on iOS 15, but will soon be updating to iOS sixteen, which includes upgrades like a customziable lock screen, the power to edit and unsend text messages and iCloud Shared Photo library.

The Milky way Z Fold 4 ships with Android 12L in the form of OneUI iv.1. Normally which Bone is amend comes downwardly to personal preference, but there’south more to this story in the example of the Z Fold.

To be specific, the Milky way Z Fold four uses Android 12L, a special version of Android 12 optimized for big screens. It’s enabled Samsung to add more tablet-like features such as a taskbar to more easily swap between apps, and ways more apps are designed to work with the larger screen, or in miniaturized versions when using the split-screen characteristic.

Multitaskers will especially love the Galaxy Z Fold 4’s ability to run two apps side by side. And you tin can easily drag and drop content from 1 window to another. For instance, we could upload photos right from the Gallery app to Google Drive.

The Galaxy Z Fold 4 also offers S Pen support, something that the iPhone has yet to practice. If you lot want to doodle or try and get some serious multi-tasking washed on a phone, the Galaxy Z Fold 4 is definitely the telephone to go for.

Winner:
Samsung Milky way Z Fold four

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max: Verdict

As you can run across in our scoring beneath, the iPhone 13 Pro Max is the improve overall telephone. But it’s too clear that there are some areas where the Galaxy Z Fold four holds an advantage, and for some its sheer versatility will make Samsung’s foldable worth the splurge.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold iv iPhone 13 Pro Max
Price (10) 4 7
Blueprint (10) vii 9
Displays (xv) 15 13
Cameras (20) 17 19
Performance (15) 13 15
Battery life and charging (20) 18 20
Software and special features(10) 10 8
Total (100) 84 91

The Galaxy Z Fold 4 shows up the iPhone 13 Pro Max when it comes to multitasking, productivity and display quality. If you need a bunch of app windows open at once, demand to do some note-taking with a stylus, or just want to relax with some brilliant big-screen video streaming or gaming, you won’t get a better experience than the Z Fold 4.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and iPhone 13 Pro Max side-by-side

(Image credit: Tom’southward Guide)

The problem is that the iPhone 13 Pro Max does amend well-nigh everywhere else. Its cameras are overall even so the best in the business, its bombardment life is height-notch, the performance is unmatched and the design is much more portable. And that’s non fifty-fifty getting to the fact information technology’south $600 cheaper, fifty-fifty if you lot’re buying an equivalent amount of storage space.

Decided the iPhone 13 Pro Max is the telephone for you? One gene you lot may want to consider is that the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max are probably just around the corner, so you should be improve off waiting rather than buying whatever iPhone 13 model.

If you’ve sided with the Galaxy Z Fold four, then accept a look at how to pre-order Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 to make certain you become yours as before long as possible.

Richard is a Tom’s Guide staff writer based in London, covering news, reviews and how-tos for phones, tablets, gaming, and whatever else people demand advice on. Following on from his MA in Magazine Journalism at the University of Sheffield, he’s also written for WIRED U.K., The Register and Creative Bloq. When not at work, he’s probable thinking about how to mash the perfect cup of specialty coffee.


Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/samsung-galaxy-z-fold-4-vs-iphone-13-pro-max-which-flagship-phone-wins