Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Vs A14 Bionic

Snapdragon 865 Plus vs A14 Bionic


A14 Bionic

We compared the eight-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus (Adreno 650) with the newer six-core Apple tree A14 Bionic (Apple tree GPU) SoC. Here you volition find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v9
  5. GeekBench 5
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (14)


Full general comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators

CPU Performance

Single and multi-core processor tests

Gaming Performance

GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan

Battery life

Efficiency of battery consumption

NanoReview Score

Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each flake

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus

  • Has ii more cores

Pros of Apple A14 Bionic

  • Has a smaller size transistor (five versus 7 nm)
  • Improve instruction fix architecture


Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu ix

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in dissimilar scenarios

CPU 192608 185695
GPU 243249 285023
Retention 133307 118389
UX 155856 131689
Total score 725402 723305

AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not straight comparable! They won’t affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw unmarried-threaded and multithreaded CPU operation

Image compression 174.85 Mpixels/southward
Face up detection 33.7 images/s
Speech recognition 95.65 words/s
Machine learning 95.viii images/s
Camera shooting 38.45 images/s
HTML v four.59 Mnodes/s
SQLite 1060 Krows/south


A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)

3DMark Wild Life Performance

Stability 82% 77%
Graphics test 25 FPS 45 FPS
Score 4175 7612


Table of boilerplate FPS and graphics settings in mobile games

PUBG Mobile 74 FPS

Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS

Fortnite 28 FPS

Earth of Tanks Blitz 104 FPS

Genshin Bear on 56 FPS

Mobile Legends: Bang Bang lx FPS

Device Asus ROG Phone 3

1080 ten 2340

We provide boilerplate results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.


Total list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 Plus and A14 Bionic


Architecture 1x three.1 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x two.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Argent (Cortex-A55)
2x 3.i GHz – Firestorm
4x i.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3100 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.ii-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 4 MB
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count eleven.8 billion
TDP x W vi W


GPU proper name Adreno 650 Apple GPU
Architecture Adreno 600
GPU frequency 645 MHz
Execution units 2 iv
Shading units 512
FLOPS 1365 Gigaflops
Vulkan version one.one
OpenCL version 2.0
DirectX version 12


Memory blazon LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz
Jitney 4x 16 Fleck
Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/due south 42.7 Gbit/south
Max size 16 GB six GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 698 Neural Engine
Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max brandish resolution 3840 x 2160 2732 ten 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, Air conditioning-iii, Eastward-AC-3, AAX, AAX+


Modem X55
4G support LTE True cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yeah Yes
Download speed Upwards to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Upwardly to 316 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.ii 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Cast your vote

And so, which SoC would you lot cull?


Full votes:

Related Comparisons

Please give your stance on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Snapdragon 865 Plus, or enquire any questions

Source: https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-865-plus-vs-apple-a14-bionic