Redmi Note 8 Pro Pubg Graphics

05/10/2022 admin 60 Views

Qualcomm Adreno 610

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). Information technology is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the former Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards similar Vulkan ane.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES iii.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX eleven (FL 11_1).

CPU in Adreno 610		GPU Base of operations Speed	GPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G	8 ten 1800 MHz	? MHz	? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	8 x 2200 MHz	? MHz	? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662	eight x 1800 MHz	? MHz	? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460	8 x 1800 MHz	? MHz	? MHz
min. – max.		? MHz	? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark
– 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics

min: 15403 avg: 22761 median:
24487.5 (iii%) max: 25351 Points

3DMark
– 3DMark Sling Shot (ES three.0) Unlimited

min: 1414 avg: 1848 median:
1814.5 (xi%) max: 2190 Points

3DMark
– 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics

min: 1295 avg: 1734 median:
1714.five (4%) max: 2096 Points

3DMark
– 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited

min: 849 avg: 1157 median:
1151 (9%) max: 1372 Points

3DMark
– 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.i) Unlimited Graphics

min: 727 avg: 1011 median:
999 (iv%) max: 1242 Points

3DMark
– 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited

min: 205 avg: 363.one median:
375.v (0%) max: 463 Points

3DMark
– 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

min: 101 avg: 117.3 median:
122 (0%) max: 124 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.seven

GFXBench two.7 T-Rex Hard disk Onscreen C24Z16
+GFXBench T-King HD Offscreen C24Z16
+

GFXBench iii.0
– GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan

min: fifteen avg: 22.8 median:
20 (5%) max: 34 fps

GFXBench 3.0
– GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen

min: 14 avg: 18.8 median:
19 (1%) max: 22 fps

GFXBench
– GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

GFXBench
– GFXBench v.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen

min: 3.9 avg: 6.2 median:
5.1 (3%) max: 11 fps

GFXBench
– GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

min: 1.4 avg: 2.7 median:
ii.8 (ane%) max: 3.three fps

GFXBench
– GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen

min: 6.two avg: 10.3 median:
8.six (iv%) max: 17 fps

GFXBench
– GFXBench five.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

min: 5.one avg: 8.1 median:
8.3 (1%) max: ix.8 fps

GFXBench
– GFXBench Automobile Chase Onscreen

min: five.7 avg: 8.vii median:
7.4 (0%) max: 14 fps

GFXBench
– GFXBench Car Hunt Offscreen

min: v.2 avg: 7 median:
7.1 (0%) max: viii.8 fps

Antutu v9
– AnTuTu v9 GPU

min: 23743 avg: 36393 median:
38302 (6%) max: 40535 Points

Basemark GPU 1.ii
– Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080

min: eight.79 avg: 11.one median:
11.i (i%) max: 12.54 fps

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
– PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests

min: 7370 avg: 16450 median:
20247 (20%) max: 21734 Points

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
– PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests

min: 1595 avg: 9470 median:
11754 (21%) max: 15062 Points

Ability Consumption
– GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Ability Consumption 150cd *

min: 2.25 avg: three median:
3 (three%) max: 3.9 Watt

– Range of benchmark values for this graphics bill of fare

– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher functioning

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics retentivity, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. Then the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed data on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low
1280×720

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

low

sixty

60^fps

[X]
OnePlus Nord N100

2.0.0.3727

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
2
fps, max:
60
fps

60^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Moto G9 Power

2.one.0.3849

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
56
fps, max:
60
fps

60^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G9 Power

ii.1.0.3849

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 ane.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
51
fps, max:
60
fps

60^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G10

2.two.0.4027

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 ane.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
53
fps, max:
threescore
fps

60^fps

[10]
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

~ 60 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparison

loftier

56^fps

[10]
Motorola Moto G10

2.ii.0.4027

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
43
fps, max:
60
fps

59^fps

[X]
Vivo Y20s

i.1.0.3585

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
fifty
fps, max:
60
fps

60^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T

2.0.0.3727

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 two.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
59
fps, max:
lx
fps

sixty^fps

[X]
OnePlus Nord N100

2.0.0.3727

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
55
fps, max:
60
fps

~ 59 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparison

» With all tested laptops playable in particular settings high.

depression

high

ultra

» With all tested laptops playable in item settings high.

low

med.

ultra

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is non playable in the tested settings.

high

thirty^fps

xxx^fps

[10]
Xiaomi Redmi Note eleven

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

xxx^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G52

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G one.8GHz

Adreno 610

38^fps

[Ten]
Xiaomi Redmi 9T

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

44^fps

[X]
Oppo A74

i.59.8

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 ane.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
33
fps, max:
57
fps

50^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Poco M3

1.56.eight

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
28
fps, max:
sixty
fps

53^fps

[X]
Lenovo Tab P11

1.57.two

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 one.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
42
fps, max:
60
fps

54^fps

[X]
Vivo Y20s

1.55.five

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
42
fps, max:
sixty
fps

57^fps

[Ten]
Nokia 3.4

i.56.eight

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
41
fps, max:
60
fps

59^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Moto G42

1.61.half dozen

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G i.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
52
fps, max:
60
fps

lx^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Defy

i.61.6

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 one.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
53
fps, max:
60
fps

60^fps

[X]
realme 9i

1.61.6

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
36
fps, max:
60
fps

~ 48 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparing

» With most tested laptops playable in particular settings high.

low

30^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Redmi Note viii

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 two.2GHz

Adreno 610

thirty^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G8

0.eighteen.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
28
fps, max:
31
fps

xxx^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G9 Play

ane.0.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 i.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
28
fps, max:
32
fps

30^fps

[X]
Vivo Y20s

1.i.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
24
fps, max:
31
fps

thirty^fps

[Ten]
Nokia 3.iv

1.1.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 one.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
27
fps, max:
31
fps

30^fps

[10]
OnePlus Nord N100

1.2.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
23
fps, max:
31
fps

30^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G9 Power

1.ii.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
21
fps, max:
31
fps

thirty^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G30

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

30^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G10

1.3.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 i.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
25
fps, max:
31
fps

30^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Redmi 9T

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

30^fps

[X]
Motorola Defy

1.6.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
28
fps, max:
31
fps

30^fps

[X]
realme 9i

i.nine.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G i.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
28
fps, max:
31
fps

30^fps

[10]
Xiaomi Redmi Annotation xi

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

thirty^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G52

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

~ 30 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparison

med.

25^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 ii.2GHz

Adreno 610

25^fps

[10]
Motorola Moto G8

0.18.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
23
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G Pro

0.xix.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
xvi
fps, max:
27
fps

25^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Moto G9 Play

one.0.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
16
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
Vivo Y20s

1.ane.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
16
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Poco M3

1.1.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 ane.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
21
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
Nokia three.four

i.1.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
22
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
OnePlus Nord N100

1.2.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 one.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
16
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[10]
Lenovo Tab P11

one.2.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
18
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G30

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 i.8GHz

Adreno 610

25^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G10

1.iii.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
21
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Redmi 9T

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 ane.8GHz

Adreno 610

25^fps

[X]
Oppo A74

1.4.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 one.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
xviii
fps, max:
27
fps

25^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Defy

one.6.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
9
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[10]
realme 9i

1.9.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G i.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
24
fps, max:
26
fps

25^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

25^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Moto G52

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G i.8GHz

Adreno 610

25^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G42

2.0.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
23
fps, max:
27
fps

~ 25 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparing

high

» The benchmarks point that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

depression

xxx^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Moto G8 Plus

1.31.1.5

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 two.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
27
fps, max:
31
fps

xxx^fps

[10]
Motorola Moto G8

1.34.1.10

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 two.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
29
fps, max:
31
fps

30^fps

[10]
Nokia 3.4

i.37.1.nine

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
29
fps, max:
31
fps

60^fps

[Ten]
Xiaomi Mi A3

1.30.2.four

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
49
fps, max:
60
fps

~ 38 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparison

ultra

30^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G8 Plus

ane.31.1.5

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 two.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
1
fps, max:
31
fps

30^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G8

1.34.1.10

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
28
fps, max:
31
fps

xxx^fps

[X]
Nokia 3.4

1.37.1.9

Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
29
fps, max:
31
fps

60^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Mi A3

1.30.ii.iv

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
28
fps, max:
60
fps

~ 38 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparison

» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

high

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

low

20^fps

[Ten]
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

20^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G8 Plus

1.viii.1a

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
11
fps, max:
30
fps

24^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G30

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

26^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Mi A3

i.vii.3a

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
16
fps, max:
31
fps

thirty^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G9 Play

2.4.7a

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
21
fps, max:
32
fps

~ 24 fps
+ Compare
– Hide Comparison

high

eleven^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G Pro

2.3.4a

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
4
fps, max:
25
fps

12^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Moto G8 Plus

1.eight.1a

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
five
fps, max:
32
fps

15^fps

[10]
Xiaomi Redmi Note eight

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

17^fps

[X]
Xiaomi Mi A3

1.7.3a

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 2.2GHz

Adreno 610

min:
7
fps, max:
31
fps

22^fps

[Ten]
Motorola Moto G30

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

23^fps

[X]
Motorola Moto G9 Play

2.4.7a

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 1.8GHz

Adreno 610

min:
14
fps, max:
31
fps

~ 17 fps
+ Compare
– Hibernate Comparing

» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

high

» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.xviii

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 610 graphics carte

Laurels fifty Calorie-free: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half-dozen.67″, 0.two kg
Review
» Honor 50 Lite review: Entry-level smartphone with thick 64 MP camera

Honor X8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Honor X8 review – Affordable mid-range smartphone with 64 MP camera

Huawei Nova 9 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.78″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Huawei Nova 9 SE Review: Chic smartphone with 108 MP photographic camera

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00″, 0.5 kg
Review
» Lenovo Tab P11 tablet review – Starting at 250 Euros: The cheapest xi-inch tablet is also an all-rounder

Motorola Defy: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half-dozen.l”, 0.2 kg
Review
» Motorola Defy smartphone review – Affordable outdoor phone with interesting pattern

Motorola Moto E7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Motorola Moto E7 Plus Smartphone Review – Cell phone upgrade in the entry-level class

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half-dozen.twoscore”, 0.2 kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone Review – Cheap Stylus Smartphone

Motorola Moto G10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.l”, 0.ii kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G10 smartphone review: Stylish, sturdy, and affordable mobile phone

Motorola Moto G30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.fifty”, 0.2 kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G30 Review: 90-Hz smartphone with an IP certification and NFC for less than 180 Euros

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, half-dozen.43″, 0.two kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G42 smartphone review: OLED lightweight with 700 nits at a bargain price

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G52 smartphone review – Affordable 90-Hz OLED phone with stereo sound and 50 MP

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G8 Smartphone Review – $200 Smartphone with Versatile Camera

Motorola Moto G8 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.xxx”, 0.two kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G8 Plus smartphone review – Mobile phone with activeness cam

Motorola Moto G8 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G8 Power Smartphone Review: Enough of battery life and practiced cameras

Motorola Moto G9 Play: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half-dozen.l”, 0.2 kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G9 Play Smartphone Review – Affordable Performance

Motorola Moto G9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Motorola Moto G9 Power smartphone review: Motorola phone with enduring battery

Nokia 3.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, vi.39″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Nokia 3.four Smartphone Review – Lightweight, Colorful Nokia Telephone

Nokia 5.three: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, vi.55″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Nokia 5.3 Smartphone Review – Slim Android-One mobile phone

Nokia 5.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, six.39″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Nokia 5.4 Smartphone Review – With Android One to the top of its class?

OnePlus Nord N100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, six.52″, 0.ii kg
Review
» OnePlus Nord N100 smartphone review: 200-Euro phone with premium features?

Oppo A52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.fifty”, 0.two kg
Review
» Oppo A52 Smartphone Review: cheaper, but non much weaker than its bigger brother A72

Oppo A72: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Oppo A72 Smartphone Review – The affordable Oppo smartphone turns out an endurance champion

Oppo A74: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Oppo A74 smartphone review: Potential Galaxy A killer?

Oppo A76: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.56″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Oppo A76 review – Beautiful phone with light and shadow

realme 9i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, six.lx”, 0.2 kg
Review
» realme 9i Smartphone review – Affordable mid-range model with stereo speakers

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.four (2020): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, ten.40″, 0.five kg
Review
» Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE Tablet Review: One of the best tablets for less than 300 Euros (~$356)

Sony Xperia 10 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.00″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Sony Xperia 10 Two smartphone in review: The rest of the mid-range does it better

Vivo Y20s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, half dozen.51″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Vivo Y20s Review – Slim entry-level smartphone with thick battery

Vivo Y70: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, vi.44″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Vivo Y70 smartphone Review – Lots of memory and battery power in a slim design

Xiaomi Mi A3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.09″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Xiaomi Mi A3 Smartphone Review – The price-performance rex once more!

Xiaomi Poco M3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53″, 0.two kg
Review
» Xiaomi Poco M3 Smartphone Review: The 150-Euro smartphone

Xiaomi Redmi 10C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.71″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Xiaomi Redmi 10C Smartphone Review – Great color reproduction for the entry-level phone

Xiaomi Redmi 9T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, six.53″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Xiaomi Redmi 9T review: Entry-level smartphone with huge bombardment, NFC, and stereo sound

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43″, 0.ii kg
Review
» Redmi Note 11 review: Xiaomi smartphone with a xc Hz OLED display and ane,000 nits at an absolute bargain price

Xiaomi Redmi Note eight: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half-dozen.xxx”, 0.2 kg
Review
» Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Smartphone Review: A display dream for the price-conscious heir-apparent

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30″, 0.2 kg
Review
» Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Review – Smartphone with the small difference

Chuwi HiPad Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.fourscore”, 0.five kg
External Review
» Chuwi HiPad Pro

Crosscall Action-X5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, v.45″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Crosscall Activeness-X5

Honor 50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Honor 50 Lite

Award X7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, six.74″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Honor X7

Honor X8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, half-dozen.seventy”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Honour X8

Honor X9 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.81″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Honor X9 4G

HTC Want 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, six.50″, 0.two kg
External Review
» HTC Desire twenty Pro

Huawei Nova 8i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Huawei Nova 8i

Huawei Nova 9 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.78″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Huawei nova 9 SE

Huawei Nova Y90: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, six.lxx”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Huawei Nova Y90

Lenovo K12 Annotation: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Lenovo K12 Note

Lenovo K12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.eighty”, 0.two kg
External Review
» Lenovo K12 Pro

Lenovo K13 Annotation: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, half dozen.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Lenovo K13 Notation

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00″, 0.5 kg
External Review
» Lenovo Tab P11

Motorola Defy: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.fifty”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Defy

Motorola Moto E7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.fifty”, 0.two kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto E7 Plus

Motorola Moto G Fast: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half dozen.forty”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G Fast

Motorola Moto G Play 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, half-dozen.50″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto Grand Play 2021

Motorola Moto G Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.twoscore”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G Power

Motorola Moto Chiliad Ability 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half dozen.60″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G Ability 2021

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half-dozen.40″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G Pro

Motorola Moto G Stylus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G Stylus

Motorola Moto G10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G10

Motorola Moto G10 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, vi.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G10 Power

Motorola Moto G30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G30

Motorola Moto G32: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G32

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.43″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G42

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G52

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G8

Motorola Moto G8 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half-dozen.xxx”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G8 Plus

Motorola Moto G8 Ability: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half-dozen.40″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G8 Power

Motorola Moto G9: unknown, half-dozen.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G9

Motorola Moto G9 Play: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G9 Play

Motorola Moto G9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.eighty”, 0.two kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto G9 Power

Motorola Moto Tab G62: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, x.60″, 0.5 kg
External Review
» Motorola Moto Tab G62

Nokia 3.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, half-dozen.39″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Nokia 3.4

Nokia 5.3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.55″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Nokia 5.3

Nokia 5.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.39″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Nokia five.4

OnePlus Nord N100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.52″, 0.two kg
External Review
» OnePlus Nord N100

Oppo A11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.fifty”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo A11

Oppo A11s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo A11s

Oppo A36: unknown, 6.56″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo A36

Oppo A5 2020: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Oppo A5 2020

Oppo A52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo A52

Oppo A53: unknown, vi.50″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo A53

Oppo A53s: unknown, half dozen.50″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo A53s

Oppo A72: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half dozen.l”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo A72

Oppo A74: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half-dozen.43″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo A74

Oppo A76: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo A76

Oppo A9 2020 (A11x): Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.fifty”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo A9 2020 (A11x)

Oppo A92: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Oppo A92

Oppo A95 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half-dozen.43″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo A95 4G

Oppo F17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.44″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo F17

Oppo F19: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo F19

Oppo F19s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Oppo F19s

Oppo F21 Pro 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo F21 Pro 4G

Oppo K10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, half-dozen.59″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo K10

Oppo Pad Air: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.36″, 0.4 kg
External Review
» Oppo Pad Air

Oppo Realme v: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo Realme 5

Oppo Realme 5i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.52″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo Realme 5i

Oppo Realme 5s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo Realme 5s

Oppo Reno6 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Oppo Reno6 Calorie-free

Oppo Reno7 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.43″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo Reno7 4G

Oppo Reno8 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.43″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Oppo Reno8 4G

realme ix 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.40″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» realme 9 4G

realme 9i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, half-dozen.lx”, 0.two kg
External Review
» realme 9i

realme C17: unknown, 6.fifty”, 0.2 kg
External Review
» realme C17

realme Narzo 20A: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, six.50″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» realme Narzo 20A

Samsung Milky way Tab A7 10.iv (2020): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.40″, 0.v kg
External Review
» Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.iv (2020)

Sony Xperia 10 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.00″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Sony Xperia ten II

TCL x Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.47″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» TCL x Plus

TCL 10L: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.53″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» TCL 10L

TCL twenty SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.82″, 0.two kg
External Review
» TCL 20 SE

TCL 20L (xx Lite): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67″, 0.two kg
External Review
» TCL 20L (twenty Light)

TCL 20L+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» TCL 20L+

TCL 20S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, half dozen.67″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» TCL 20S

Vivo iQOO U5x: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, half-dozen.51″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo iQOO U5x

Vivo U10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.35″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo U10

Vivo U3x: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.35″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Vivo U3x

Vivo V17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.38″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Vivo V17

Vivo V20 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.44″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Vivo V20 SE

Vivo X50 Low-cal: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.38″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Vivo X50 Light

Vivo Y11s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, vi.51″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y11s

Vivo Y20: unknown, 6.51″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Vivo Y20

Vivo Y20i: unknown, 6.51″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y20i

Vivo Y20s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, half dozen.51″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Vivo Y20s

Vivo Y20T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half-dozen.51″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y20T

Vivo Y21e: unknown, 6.51″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Vivo Y21e

Vivo Y21T: unknown, 6.51″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y21T

Vivo Y22s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.55″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y22s

Vivo Y31: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, six.58″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y31

Vivo Y32: unknown, 6.51″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y32

Vivo Y33T: unknown, six.58″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Vivo Y33T

Vivo Y50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.53″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y50

Vivo Y51: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, six.58″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y51

Vivo Y55 2022: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.44″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y55 2022

Vivo Y70: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.44″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Vivo Y70

Xiaomi Mi A3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.09″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Mi A3

Xiaomi Mi CC9e
: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.01″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Mi CC9e

Xiaomi Poco M3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53″, 0.two kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Poco M3

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Ability: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Redmi 10 Power

Xiaomi Redmi 10C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.71″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Redmi 10C

Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half dozen.53″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power

Xiaomi Redmi 9T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, half-dozen.53″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Redmi 9T

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Redmi Notation 11

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30″, 0.ii kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, vi.30″, 0.2 kg
External Review
» Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T

Honor l Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, vi.67″, 0.2 kg

» Honor 50 Calorie-free: Merely bonny at a disbelieve?

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00″, 0.5 kg

» Lenovo Tab P11: The cheapest 11-inch tablet at the moment scores points with good features and versatility

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.xl”, 0.2 kg

» Motorola Moto G Pro: Affordable stylus smartphone makes a good impression in our review

Motorola Moto G10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50″, 0.2 kg

» Motorola Moto G10: Why we’re excited about the case

Motorola Moto G30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, six.50″, 0.2 kg

» The depression-priced mid-range smartphone Motorola Moto G30 has a large problem

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43″, 0.2 kg

» Motorola Moto G42: Budget 4G smartphone with OLED panel and a l MP camera

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, vi.threescore”, 0.ii kg

» Verdict Motorola Moto G52 – This signature Moto feature is missing from the mid-range phone

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, six.forty”, 0.2 kg

» Moto G8: Adept Cameras for Cheap?

Motorola Moto G8 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.thirty”, 0.2 kg

» Moto G8 Plus: Cheaper mid-ranger with rotated camera

Motorola Moto G8 Ability: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40″, 0.2 kg

» Motorola Moto G8 Power: A decent midrange smartphone that skimps on Wi-Fi connectivity

Motorola Moto G9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, vi.fourscore”, 0.two kg

» Motorola Moto G9 Power: Battery life is practiced, but…

Nokia v.iv: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.39″, 0.2 kg

» The latest Android I smartphone from HMD Global, Nokia v.4, shows how not to do product maintenance

OnePlus Nord N100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.52″, 0.2 kg

» Nord N100: Is the cheapest smartphone from OnePlus cheap plenty?

Oppo A52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50″, 0.2 kg

» Oppo A52: ColorOS eleven is coming to the depression-priced A series smartphone in the fourth quarter

Oppo A72: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.fifty”, 0.ii kg

» Oppo’due south Efforts in the Mid-Range are More Promising than in the Premium Segment

Oppo A74: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43″, 0.2 kg

» Oppo A74: The review results in overview

Samsung Milky way Tab A7 x.four (2020): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.40″, 0.v kg

» Samsung Milky way Tab A7 LTE: Overview of the Test Results

Sony Xperia ten 2: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.00″, 0.2 kg

» Sony Xperia 10 II: The same strengths, the same weaknesses

Xiaomi Poco M3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, six.53″, 0.2 kg

» Xiaomi Poco M3: An overview of the test results

Xiaomi Redmi 9T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53″, 0.2 kg

» Review verdict on the Redmi 9T: The low-priced Xiaomi smartphone is the amend Poco M3?!

Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Qualcomm-Adreno-610-GPU-Benchmarks-and-Specs.434054.0.html