Intel Core i9-10900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Comparing Cadre i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X processor market blazon (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
|Place in performance rating||219||61|
|Value for money||49.44||54.12|
|Market segment||Desktop processor||Desktop processor|
|AMD Ryzen 9|
20 May 2020
(2 years ago)
8 October 2020
(1 year agone)
|Launch price (MSRP)||$488||$799|
|Current cost||$350 (0.7x MSRP)||$731 (0.9x MSRP)|
Value for money
To get the alphabetize nosotros compare the characteristics of the processors and their price, taking into business relationship the cost of other processors.
Cadre i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base of operations frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you take to consider their test results.
|Physical cores||10 (Deca-Core)||16 (Hexadeca-Core)|
|Base clock speed||3.7 GHz||3.4 GHz|
|Boost clock speed||5.2 GHz||4.9 GHz|
|L1 enshroud||64K (per core)||64K (per core)|
|L2 cache||256K (per core)||512K (per core)|
|L3 cache||twenty MB (shared)||64 MB|
|Chip lithography||14 nm||7 nm|
2x 80.seven + 125 (I/O) mm2
|Maximum cadre temperature||100 °C||
|Maximum case temperature (TCase)||72 °C||95 °C|
|64 flake support||+||+|
|Windows 11 compatibility||+||+|
Information on Core i9-10900K and Ryzen ix 5950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
|Number of CPUs in a configuration||1||ane|
|Thermal design ability (TDP)||125 Watt||105 Watt|
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900K and Ryzen ix 5950X. You lot’ll probably need this information if y’all require some particular technology.
|Teaching set extensions||Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.ii, Intel® AVX2||86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.ii, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost ii|
|Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)||+||
|Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)||+||
|Turbo Boost Engineering||2.0||
|Turbo Boost Max 3.0||+||
Core i9-10900K and Ryzen ix 5950X technologies aimed at improving security, for case, by protecting against hacks.
|SGX||Yes with Intel® ME||
Virtual auto speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X. Depending on the motherboards, higher retentiveness frequencies may exist supported.
|Supported memory types||DDR4-2933||DDR4-3200|
|Maximum memory size||128 GB||128 GB|
|Max memory channels||two||2|
|Maximum memory bandwidth||45.8 GB/s||51.196 GB/s|
|ECC memory support||–||–|
Full general parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
|Integrated graphics card||Intel UHD Graphics 630||–|
|Max video memory||64 GB||–|
|Quick Sync Video||+||–|
|Clear Video Hard disk drive||+||–|
|Graphics max frequency||1.ii GHz||–|
Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X integrated GPUs.
|Number of displays supported||three||–|
Graphics epitome quality
Maximum display resolutions supported past Core i9-10900K and Ryzen ix 5950X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
|4K resolution back up||+||–|
|Max resolution over HDMI ane.4||4096 10 2160@30Hz||–|
|Max resolution over eDP||4096 x 2304@60Hz||–|
|Max resolution over DisplayPort||4096 x 2304@60Hz||–|
Graphics API support
APIs supported past Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported past Core i9-10900K and Ryzen ix 5950X.
|PCI Express lanes||16||
Diverse benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, college is better.
This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot detect some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak upward in comments section, we normally fix bug apace.
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench ten 32-bit multi-core
- wPrime 32
- Cinebench eleven.5 64-fleck multi-cadre
- Cinebench xv 64-scrap multi-core
- Cinebench xi.5 64-scrap unmarried-core
- Cinebench 15 64-chip single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- WinRAR iv.0
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass one
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating signal math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics adding. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring unmarried-core operation.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
GeekBench v Single-Cadre is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure out operation. This version uses merely a unmarried CPU cadre.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
GeekBench 5 Multi-Cadre is a cross-platform application adult in the grade of CPU tests that independently recreate sure real-earth tasks with which to accurately measure out performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Criterion coverage: 37%
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing criterion for processors past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorbike.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Criterion coverage: xix%
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor exam, which calculates square roots of first 32 meg integer numbers. Its upshot is measured in seconds, then that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Criterion coverage: xviii%
Cinebench Release eleven.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.five which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Criterion coverage: 14%
Cinebench R11.5 is an onetime benchmark past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by afterwards versions of Cinebench, which utilise more modernistic variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Unmarried Core version loads a unmarried thread with ray tracing to return a glossy room total of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Information technology was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which apply more modern variants of Picture palace 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room total of reflective spheres and calorie-free sources.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-wing-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures information encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Criterion coverage: 13%
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. Information technology contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Criterion coverage: 12%
x264 Pass two is a slower variant of x264 video pinch that produces a variable bit charge per unit output file, which results in amend quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark effect is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 pinch method to compress a sample Hard disk (720p) video. Pass i is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its consequence is measured in frames per second, which ways how many frames of the source video file were encoded per 2d.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Advantages and disadvantages
|Novelty||xx May 2020||eight Oct 2020|
|Boost clock speed||5300||4900|
|Base of operations clock speed||3700||3400|
|Chip lithography||xiv nm||7 nm|
|Thermal pattern power (TDP)||125 Watt||105 Watt|
Judging past the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Should you still have questions on option between Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply.
Cast your vote
Do you recall we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking “Similar” button nigh your favourite CPU.
Competitors of Core i9-10900K past AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Cadre i9-10900K from AMD is Ryzen 7 3800XT, which is faster past one% and higher by one position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i9-10900K:
Competitors of Ryzen 9 5950X past Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen ix 5950X past Intel is Core i9-12900KS, which is slower by two% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen ix 5950X:
Similar processor comparisons
Nosotros picked several similar comparisons of processors in the aforementioned market segment and functioning relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
Here y’all can meet how users rate the processors, besides as charge per unit them yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can inquire a question about Cadre i9-10900K or Ryzen 9 5950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.